Productive parameters of cattle fed with dry ruminal content
Keywords:
recycled, food, weight gain, food consumptionAbstract
The ruminal content is the product obtained from the benefit of bovine animals in slaughterhouses, represented by the food ingested by polygastric animals, which is discarded at the time of slaughter. In cattle the rumen volume is 48 L or 15 to 21% of body weight and 30 to 60 kg, which varies with the diet and with the rate of passage through the digestive tract. 12 calves with an average weight of 250 kg were used, distributed completely randomly in 4 treatments (T): T1, T2, T3 and T4, with 30%, 20%, 10% and 0.0% of ruminal content in the diet, respectively. Food consumption was evaluated every third day, body weight only at the beginning and end of the experiment, and feed conversion was calculated. The results were statistically analyzed by a completely randomized design by analysis of variance (P > 0.05). The average dry matter found in the cattle slaughtered was 4.05 kg. When exposed to the sun on a cement board, it dries in 10 days, being necessary to turn it three times, then it can be crushed. When performing the chemical analysis proximal to this product, it was found that it contained 12.6% crude protein. In the present study, no significant differences were found for any study variable. The weight gain was greater than 1.0 kg/day. The ruminal content obtained from the trail and dried in the sun contained 12.6% crude protein, which can be used in animal feed without affecting production parameters; It also reduces costs for food.
References
ACEVEDO-MONTOYA D, Buitrago-Arteaga LF, Valeska Villegas MR, Cerón JM. 2008. Evaluación del contenido ruminal como suplemento alimenticio para el consumo de ganado bovino ensilándolo con lactobacillus casei. Tesis de Licenciatura de ingeniería de procesos. Universidad EAFIT. Medellín. Colombia. https://repository.eafit.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10784/403/Diana_AcevedoMontoya_2008.pdf;jsessionid=E36C70BAC47D57231CFCCCC45654B426?sequence=1
ARAUJO Febres O, Vergara-López J. 2007. Propiedades físicas y químicas del rumen. Arch. Latinoam. Prod. Anim. 15(1). http://www.bioline.org.br/pdf?la07044
BRACHO-ESPINOZA H. 2017. Valoración del contenido ruminal de bovinos beneficiados en el municipio Piritu estado Falcon-Venezuela, como recurso alimenticio. Engormix.com
https://www.engormix.com/ganaderia-leche/articulos/valoracion-contenido-ruminal-bovinos-t40610.htm
CASTRILLÓN QO, Jiménez Para, Bedoya MO. 2002. Porquinaza en la alimentación animal. Revista Lasallista de investigación. 1(1): 72-76.
CERVANTES FJ, Saldívar-Cabrales JY, Yescasi JF. 2007. Estrategias para el aprovechamiento de desechos porcinos en la agricultura. Revista Latinoamericana de Recursos Naturales. 3(1):3-12.
CHURCH DC. 1974. Fisiología digestiva y nutrición de los rumiantes. Editorial Acribia. Zaragoza, España.
DOMÍNGUEZ-LARA F, García Valladares A. 2007.Utilización de contenido ruminal fresco sustituyendo al rastrojo de maíz en la alimentación de vaquillas en finalización. Tesis de licenciatura de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. México.
ESPINOZA-ZAMORA A, Orozco-Benítez G, Vázquez López Y, Romo-Rubio J, Escalera-Valente J, Martínez-González S. 2019. Una revisión sobre la pulpa de naranja: cantidad, composición y usos. Abanico Agroforestal. 1:1-14. ISSN 2594-1992.
https://abanicoacademico.mx/revistasabanico/index.php/abanico-agroforestal/article/view/208/284
HERNÁNDEZ-ESPINOSA G, Alejandra Herrera-Corredor, Marco Rivas-Jacobo, Cesar Ibarra Gudiño, Rosa Lepe-Aguilar, Sergio Martínez-González. 2019. Empresa sustentable de producción de cerdos, ovinos y limones. Abanico Agroforestal. 1(1):1-9. https://abanicoacademico.mx/revistasabanico/index.php/abanico-agroforestal/article/view/220
INEGI. 2001. Tepic Estado de Nayarit. Cuaderno estadístico municipal. http://www.inafed.gob.mx/work/enciclopedia/EMM18nayarit/municipios/18017a.html
KARNATI SKR, Sylvester JT, Ribeiro CVDM, Gilligan LE, Firkins JL. 2009. Investigating unsaturated fat, monensin, or bromoethanesulfonate in continuous cultures retaining ruminal protozoa. I. Fermentation, biohydrogenation, and microbial protein synthesis. Journal of Dairy Science. 92: 3849–3860. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1436
LOVETT DK, Stack L, Lovell S, Callan J, Flynn B, Hawkins M, O’Mara FP. 2006. Effect of feeding Yucca schidigera extract on performance of lactating dairy cows and ruminal fermentation parameters in steers. Livestock Science. 102: 23– 32.
MUNGUÍA-XÓCHIHUA J, Duran-Puga N, Alejo-Santiago G, Salgado-Moreno S, Carrillo-Díaz F, Martínez-González S. 2019. Cuantificación de Cu, Fe, Zn y Mo en pollinaza generada en pre lluvias, en lluvias y post lluvias. Abanico Agroforestal. 1(1):1-7.
https://abanicoacademico.mx/revistasabanico/index.php/abanico-agroforestal/article/view/219
NRC (National Research Council). 1980. Mineral Tolerances of Domestic Animals. National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC. USA.
PHILLIPSON AT. 1981. Digestión en el rumiante. En: Fisiología de los animales domésticos. Dukes HH, Swenson MJ (Eds). Aguilar Editor S.A. Mexico.
RÍOS VM, Ramírez HL. 2012. Aprovechamiento del contenido ruminal bovino para ceba cunicola, como estrategia para diezmar la contaminación generada por el matadero en San Alberto. Prospect. Vol. 10(2):56-63.
SOSA QR. 2006. Alimentación de ganado de carne en estabulación. ECAG Informa. 38: 14-17. http://atenas.utn.ac.cr/images/revista/ecag38.pdf
TRILLOS G, Plata O, Mestre A, Araujo G. 2007. Análisis físico-químicos de los contenidos ruminales frescos y ensilados de bovinos sacrificados en el Valle del César. Facultad de Ingeniería. Programa de Agroindustria. Universidad Popular del César. Valledupar. Colombia. http://www.ergomix.com
UICAB-BRITO LA, Sandoval-Castro CA. 2003. Uso del contenido ruminal y algunos residuos de la industria cárnica en la elaboración de composta. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 2: 45-63.
VANGARU M, Lee JH, Kouakou B, Terril TH, Kannan G. 2009. Effect of feed deprivation time on bacterial contamination of skin and carcass of meat goats. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 11: 259-261.
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
