Estimation of methane in lambs under dry conditions with a maintenance diet and probiotics

Authors

Keywords:

sheep, methane, cost, food

Abstract

The purpose was to estimate methane emissions and economic optimum in sheep under dry conditions with a maintenance diet, compare biopreparations of non-commercial microorganisms (PNC) and commercial probiotic REVET® (PCRE) at different concentrations in sheep in the semi-arid of Zacatecas. The experiment was carried out in El Remolino, Juchipila, Zacatecas, 21 Katahdin X Dorper cross sheep weighing 14.3±1.74 kg and maintenance diet were used. The PNC was included in T1 (100%), T2 (66%), T3 (33%), and a control T4, while the same conditions were applied to the PCRE in T5 (100%), T6 (66%), and T7 (33%). Weight was recorded and rumen content samples were obtained to quantify volatile fatty acids (VFAs), methane and ammonia. An analysis of variance was performed, and response functions were calculated to identify the economic optimum. Treatment T2 stands out, which used the PNC and showed the highest amount of VFAs with an intermediate production of methane, however, the best treatment was T6 PCRE of the microorganism biopreparation since it showed consistency in the production of VFAs and less methane concentration, but with a higher investment and lower economic gain. Microorganism biopreparations are an option for sheep producers with less investment capacity in the semi-arid region of Zacatecas.

http://dx.doi.org/10.21929/abavet2024.8  

e2023-22

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D3VT1UbcrGY

 

References

BUENO CA, Lemes NH. 2008. Microorganismos Eficientes en levante de novillas Brahman bajo pastoreo semi-intensivo suplementado en la región de Palmira, Valle del Cauca. Revista Ciencia Animal. 1(1):17-25.

https://ciencia.lasalle.edu.co/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1002&context=ca

DELGADILLO-RUIZ L, Bañuelos-Valenzuela R, Gallegos-Flores P, Meza-López C, Echavarría-Cháirez F, Valladares-Carranza B. 2022. Ruminal bacteria and protozoa present in sheep supplemented with probiotics identified by counting and PCR endpoint. Abanico Veterinario. 12. e2021-75. https://doi.org/10.21929/abavet2022.6

DELGADILLO-RUIZ L, Bañuelos-Valenzuela R, Echavarría-Cháirez F, Gallegos-Flores PI, Meza-López C. 2019. Uso de extractos de plantas en la fermentación ruminal in vitro. Abanico veterinario. 9(1):1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.21929/abavet2019.917

DELGADO FR, Barreto AG, Rodríguez TH. 2019. Efecto probiótico de Saccharomyces cerevisiae en la ganancia de peso de terneros Siboney de Cuba en pastoreo. InfoCiencia. 20(2):20-29. https://www.redalyc.org/journal/6378/637869112009/637869112009.pdf

ECHAVARRÍA CFG, Gutiérrez LR, Rivera RIL, Ledezma R, Bañuelos VR, Aguilera SJI, Serna PA. 2006. Influencia del sistema de pastoreo con pequeños rumiantes en un agostadero del semiárido Zacatecano: I Vegetación nativa. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 44(2):203-217.

https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/view/1748

EL-SAYED AA, Mousa SA. 2020. Effects of administration of probiotic on body growth and hematobiochemical profile in growing Barki lambs. Comparative Clinical Pathology. 29(1):297-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-019-03057-z

GALLEGOS-FLORES P, Bañuelos-Valenzuela R, Delgadillo-Ruiz L, Echavarría-Cháirez F, Meza-López C, Rodríguez-Tenorio D. 2019. Evaluación diferencial de extractos de orégano en la producción de ácidos grasos volátiles y metano durante fermentación ruminal in vitro. Abanico veterinario. 9:1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.21929/abavet2019.91

GERBER P, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Opio C, Mottet A, Robinson T, Falcucci A, Tempio G, MacLeod M, Vellinga T. 2017. The global livestock environmental as-sessment model. Food and Agriculture Organiza-tion of the United Nations (FAO), 22-6.

https://www.fao.org/climatechange/42050-09ec47f2ffd4be66e383046681c07df00.pdf

GONZÁLEZ GH, Martínez RR, Orozco AE, Perea HN, López BM, Holguín CL, Hernández HEC. 2010. Efecto del tipo de dieta y del grupo racial sobre el comportamiento digestivo en borregos: efecto del nivel de consumo y de la relación forraje, concentrado sobre el comportamiento digestivo en borregos. Colección Reportes Técnicos de Investigación. 2: 41. http://www3.uacj.mx/DGDCDC/SP/Documents/RTI/2015/ICB/-Digestibilidad.pdf

INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía). 2021. Anuario Estadístico y geográfico por entidad federativa 2021.

https://www.inegi.org.mx/app/biblioteca/ficha.html?upc=889463904847

ISLAM MR, Bilkis S, Hoque TS, Uddin S, Jahiruddin M, Rahman MM, Alhomrani M, Gaber A, Hossain MA. 2021. Mineralization of farm manures and slurries for successive release of carbon and nitrogen in incubated soils varying in moisture status under controlled laboratory conditions. Agriculture. 11(9), e846.

https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11090846

JOHNSON DE, Johnson KA, Ward GM, Branine ME. 2000. Ruminants and other animals. In Atmospheric Methane, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Pp. 112-133.

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-04145-1_8

KHATTAB M, Abdel-Wahed AM, Khattab AS, Anele UY, El-Keredy A, Zaher M. 2020. Effect of dietary probiotics supplementation on intake and production performance of ewes fed Atriplex hay-based diet. Livestock Science. 237, e104065.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104065

KYAN T, Shintani M, Kanda S, Sakurai M, Ohashi H, Fujisawa A, Pongdit S. 1999. Kyusei nature farming and the technology of effective microorganisms. Asia-Pacific Natural Agriculture Network. http://www.emturkey.com.tr/eskisite/TR/dosya/1-679/h/manuel-book.pdf

KHOLIF AE, Hassan AA, El Ashry GM, Bakr MH, El-Zaiat HM, Olafadehan OA, Sallam SMA. 2021. Phytogenic feed additives mixture enhances the lactational performance, feed utilization and ruminal fermentation of Friesian cows. Animal Biotechnology. 32(6):708-718. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495398.2020.1746322

LIMA PDMT, Crouzoulon P, Sanches TP, Zabré G, Kabore A, Niderkorn V, Hoste H, Amarante AFTD, Costa-Júnior LM, Abdalla AL, Louvandini H. 2019. Effects of Acacia mearnsii supplementation on nutrition, parasitological, blood parameters and methane emissions in Santa Inês sheep infected with Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Haemonchus contortus. Experimental parasitology. 207, e107777.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exppara.2019.107777

LÓPEZ Y, Arece J, OjedaF, Molina M. 2015. Efecto de la inclusión en la dieta del probiótico Sorbifauna sobre los crecimientos posdestete de ovinos estabulados. Pastos y Forrajes. 38(2):202-206. http://scielo.sld.cu/pdf/pyf/v38n2/pyf08215.pdf

MARKOWIAK P, Ślizewska K. 2018. The role of probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics in animal nutrition. Gut Pathogens. 10(1):1-20.

https://gutpathogens.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13099-018-0250-0

MOSS AR, Jouany JP, Newbold J. 2000. Methane production by ruminants: Its contribution to global warming. Annales de zootechnie. 49(3): 231-253.

https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2000119

MOLINA A. 2019. Probióticos y su mecanismo de acción en alimentación animal. Agronomía Mesoamericana. 30(2):601-611. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v30i2.34432

PAGANONI B, Rose G, Macleay C, Jones C, Brown DJ, Kearney G, Ferguson M, Thompson AN. 2017. More feed efficient sheep produce less methane and carbon dioxide when eating high-quality pellets. Journal of Animal Science. 95(9):3839-3850. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2017.1499

SAS, 2021. Institute Inc, “SAS software 9.3”, en SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.

https://support.sas.com/documentation/onlinedoc/base/procstat93m1.pdf

SUÁREZ-MACHÍN C, Guevara-Rodríguez CA. 2017. Levadura Saccharomyces cerevisiae en la alimentación de rumiantes. Revisión bibliográfica. ICIDCA. Sobre los Derivados de la Caña de Azúcar. 51(2): 21-30.

https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2231/223154251004.pdf

WANAPAT M, Kang S, Polyorach S. 2013. Development of feeding systems and strategies of supplementation to enhance rumen fermentation and ruminant production in the tropics. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology. 4(1):1-11.

https://jasbsci.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/2049-1891-4-32

ZHOU Z, Meng Q, Yu Z. 2011. Effects of methanogenic inhibitors on methane production and abundances of methanogens and cellulolytic bacteria in in vitro ruminal cultures. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 77(8):2634-2639.

https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02779-10

Published

2024-05-25

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)