Sustainable company producing pigs, sheep and lemons

Authors

Keywords:

recycled, food, water, fertilizer

Abstract

The pig industry, bound by sanitary requirements, has been in need of finding a way out of solid waste, produced in its normal operation, the so-called sow, an available food resource. Over the years, various technologies have been developed to solve this problem by physical, chemical and biological means such as separation of solids, drying, fermentation, silage, etc. The process of fermentation in drums may be feasible to use. On the floor the lock was deposited, adding water to reach 60% humidity and 10% sorghum to accelerate the fermentation process, then this product is deposited in 200 liter plastic drums, which were covered with nylon and It is fixed around the hole with a rubber or plastic spring to prevent oxygenation. In the minimum fermentation process it is 25 days, during which the sow loses the smell of pig. In a stirrer, the sow is added together with the stubble and other ingredients, obtaining the balanced food. Water is treated in optional lagoons. The company is considered sustainable by recycling water, using sheep droppings as fertilizer and / or building bricks, and using fermented locks as sheep feed. The sow is an economic, palatable and nutritional food for sheep, which makes it an excellent quality food.

References

ARNDT DL, Day LD, Hatfield EE. 1979. Processing and handling of animal excreta for refeeding. Journal of Animal Science. 48:157-162.

CASTRILLÓN QO, Jiménez Para, Bedoya MO. 2002. Porquinaza en la alimentación animal. Revista Lasallista de investigación. 1(1): 72-76.

CERVANTES FJ, Saldívar-Cabrales JY, Yescasi JF. 2007. Estrategias para el aprovechamiento de desechos porcinos en la agricultura. Revista Latinoamericana de Recursos Naturales. 3(1):3-12.

CANTON JJ, Beldar-Casso R, Sandoval-Castro CA. 2005. Nutritive valve of fresh swine excreta for growing pelibuey sheep. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 27: 89-94

CHAO Espinosa R, Sosas Caceres R, Díaz Capdesuñer Y. 2012. Gasto de agua de limpieza y tratamiento del residual en naves de ceba porcina. Revista Ciencias Técnicas Agropecuarias. 21(3):69-72. ISSN 2071-0054.

http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2071-00542012000300011

DESHCK A, Abo-Shehada M, Allonby E, Givens DI, Hill YR. 1998. Assessment of the nutritive value for ruminants of poultry litter. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 73:29-35.

FONTENOT JP, Webb KE, Libke YKG, Buchles RJ. 1971. Performance and health of ewes fed broiler litter. J. Anim. Sci. 33:283.

GUPTA G, Kely P. 1990. Toxicity (EC 50) comparisons of some animal wastes. Water Air and Soil Pollution. 53: 113-117.

HENDERSON DC. 1990. The Veterinary book for sheep farmers. Farming Press Books. Inglaterra.

INEGI. Prontuario de información geográfica municipal de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos Ixtlán del Río, Nayarit Clave geoestadística 18006 2009. https://www.inegi.org.mx/contenidos/app/mexicocifras/datos_geograficos/18/18006.pdf

JENSEN R, Swift BL. 1982. Diseases of sheep.2ª ed. Lea & Febiger. Philadelphia. USA.

JUANTORENA A, Alfaro O, Sánchez EI. 2000. Alternativas para el tratamiento del Residual Porcino. Parte 1. Tecnología Química. 21(2): 69-76.

MACKIE RI, Stroot PG, VAREL VH. 1998. Biochemical identification and biological origin of key odor components in livestock waste. Journal of Animal Science. 76:1331-1342.

MARISCAL LG. 2007. Tratamiento excretas cerdos. FAO, Capítulo 7. www.fao.org/wairdocs/LEAD/X6372S/x6372s08.htm *CENID Fisiología, INIFA.

Martínez-González S, Macías-Coronel H, Moreno-Flores L, Zepeda-García J, Espinoza- Moreno M, Figueroa-Morales R, Ruiz-Félix M. 2011.

Análisis económico en la producción de ovinos en Nayarit, México. Abanico Veterinario. 1(1):37-47. ISSN 2448-6132.

https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=45596

MESCHY F. 2000. Recent progress in the assessment of mineral requirements of goats. Livestock Prod. Sci. 64:9-14.

MUFARREGE D. 2003. Corrientes, Noticias y Comentarios No. 381. www.producción-animal.com.ar

MUNGUÍA-XÓCHIHUA J, Duran-Puga N, Alejo-Santiago G, Salgado-Moreno S, Carrillo-Díaz F, Martínez-González S. 2019. Cuantificación de Cu, Fe, Zn y Mo en pollinaza generada en pre lluvias, en lluvias y post lluvias. Abanico Agroforestal. 1(1):1-7.

https://abanicoacademico.mx/revistasabanico/index.php/abanico-agroforestal/article/view/219/311

NRC (National Research Council). 1980. Mineral Tolerances of Domestic Animals. National Academy of Sciences. Washington, DC. USA.

PADILLA GEC, Castellanos RAF, Canton CJG, Moguer OYB. 2000. High levels of animal excreta in feed for sheep. Livestock Research for Rural Development. 12: 1-9.

SHARMAN GAM, Angus KW. 1991. Inorganic and organic poisons. En Diseases of sheep. Editado por Martin WB, Aitken ID. 2ª ed. Blackwell MZV. Austria.

SMITH LW. 1976. The nutrition potential recycled wastes new In: Feed resources proceedings. Technical Consultation held in Roma, In: FAO. Animal Production and Health Paper 4: 227-243.

SMITH LW, Wheeler NE. 1979. Nutrition and economic value of animal excreta. Journal of Animal Science. 48: 144-186.

SOSA QR. 2006. Alimentación de ganado de carne en estabulación. ECAG Informa. 38: 14-17. http://atenas.utn.ac.cr/images/revista/ecag38.pdf

VENOTTI MB, Rashash M, Hunt G. 2002. Solid-liquid Separation of Flushed Swine Manure with Pam, Effect of Wastewater Strength. American Society of Agriculture Engineers. 45(6): 1959-1969.

TAIGANIDES EP, Pérez R, Girón E. 1996. Agua Residual en Manual para el manejo y control de aguas residuales y excretas porcinas en México. Pp. 56-59. Consejo Mexicano de Porcicultura. A.C. México.

TÓRTORA PJL. 2002. Fortalecimiento del Sistema Producto Ovinos. Tecnologías para Ovinocultores. Sistema Producto Ovinos. No. 48: 216-222

Published

2019-11-19

Issue

Section

Estudio de Casos

Most read articles by the same author(s)