Evaluation of eight species of endemic trees of the state of Sonora in agricultural land
Keywords:
native plants, height, coverage, stemAbstract
The change in land use and factors such as overgrazing, long periods of drought and intensive agriculture have caused that Sonora's pastures lose more than half of their productive potential. The recovery of deteriorated soils is gradual and long-term, so that it is urgent to implement rehabilitation programs in these areas. According to the results, with respect to height, there were no significant differences of some species such as: palo verde c., palo fierro and mesquite with values of 37.11 to 45.56 cm, with respect to the rest of the species ( green stick a., white stick, tepehuaje, green stick H. ATZ and ceiba tésota), with values of 90.6 to 112.7 cm. In aerial coverage, there were no significant differences, in palo blanco, palo fierro and ceiba tésota with covers of 390.3 to 4394 cm2, except for the species of palo verde c., palo verde a., tepehuaje, mesquite and palo v. h ATZ with coverage from 3111 to 10068 cm2. Finally, as regards stem coverage, there were no significant differences between the species of palo verde c., palo verde a., tepehuaje, palo fierro, mesquite, palo v. h ATZ and ceiba tésota with stems of 0.5592 to 3.0356 cm2, except the white stick with 12.0480 cm2. It is possible that these species, 6 months after their establishment in abandoned agricultural areas, can rehabilitate areas in the short term.
References
AMPONSAH I, Comeau P, Brockley R, Lieffers V. 2005. Effects of repeated fertilization on needle longevity, foliar nutrition, effective leaf area index, and growth characteristics of lodgepole pine in interior British Columbia, Canada. Can. J. For. Res. 35: 440-451.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/24.10.1099
ARCGIS. 2014. Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geografphics, CNES/Arirbus DS. USDA, USCS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the Gis User Community. Software 10.1
BAUHUS JV, Winden AP, Nicotra AB. 2004. Above–ground interactions and productivity in mixed–species plantations of Acacia mearnsii and Eucalyptus globulus. Can. J. Forest. Res. 34:686–694.https://doi.org/10.1139/x03-243
BENAVIDES-SOLORIO J, González-Guillén M, López-Paniagua C, Valdez-Lazalde R. 2008. Oferta hídrica de la cuenca forestal Tapalpa, Jalisco, orientada hacia los servicios ambientales. Madera y Bosques. 14(2):5-28. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-
&lng=es&nrm=iso>. ISSN 2448-7597
BINKLEY D, Giardina C, Bashkin MA. 2000. Soil phosphorous pools and supply under the influence of Eucalyptus saligna and nitrogen–fixing Albizia facaltaria. Forest. Ecology and Management. 128:241–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00138-3
BINKLEY D, Senock R, Bird S, Cole T. G. 2003. Twenty years of stand development in pure and mixed stands of Eucalyptus saligna and N–fixing Facaltaria moluccana. Forest Ecol. Managem. 182:93–102 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(03)00028-8
BRAUMAN KA, Daily GC, Duarte TK, Mooney HA. 2007. The nature and value of ecosystem services: an overview highlighting hydrologic services. Annual Review of Environmental Resources. 32:67-98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.32.031306.102758
CADOTTE MW, Carscadden K, Mirotchnick N. 2011. Beyond species: functional diversity and the maintenance of ecological processes and services. Journal of Applied Ecology 48(5):1079-1087. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02048.x
CASANOVA LF, Ramírez AL, Solorio SFJ. 2007. Interacciones radiculares en sistemas agroforestales: mecanismos y opciones de manejo. Avances en Investigación Agropecuaria. 11(3): 41-52. ISSN: 0188-789
CCE. Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas. 2002. Hacia una estrategia temática para la protección del suelo. (En línea) Comunicación de la comisión al consejo, el Parlamento Europeo, el comité económico y social y el comité de las regiones. Brúcelas. Disponible en http//www.oei.es/salactsi/ue.htm. (Fecha de consulta septiembre 2008).
CREWS TE, Peoples MB. 2005. Can the synchrony of nitrogen supply and crop demand be improved in legume and fertilizer–based agroecosystems? A review. Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosys. 72:101–120. DOI: 10.1007/s10705-004-6480-1
EHRENFELD JG. 2000. Defining the limits of restoration: the need for realistic goals. Restoration Ecology 8(1):2-9 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1526-100x.2000.80002.x
GALLEGO BURBANO E, Morales Velasco V, Vivas Quila N. 2012. Propuesta para el uso de Especies Arbóreas y Arbustivas Forrajeras en Sistemas Ganaderos en el Valle del Patía. Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial. 10(2):207 – 216. ISSN 1692-3561
HOBBS RJ, Norton DA. 1996. Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology. 4(2):93-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1996.tb00112.x
JEREZ M, Dean T, Cao Q, Roberts S. 2005. Describing leaf area distribution in Loblolly Pine trees with Johnson's SB function. Forest Science. 51(2): 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/51.2.93
JMP. 2002. The Statistical Discovery Software. SAS institute Inc.Ver. 5.0.1
KREMEN C, Ostfeld RS. 2005. A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 3(10):540-548. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0540:ACTEMA]2.0.CO;2
LÓPEZ-PANIAGUA C, González-Guillén M, Valdez-Lazalde JR, De los Santos-Posadas HM. 2007. Demanda, disponibilidad de pago y costo de oportunidad hídrica en la cuenca Tapalpa, Jalisco. Madera y Bosques. 13(1):3-23. ISSN: 1405-0471
MANSON RH. 2004. Los servicios hidrológicos y la conservación de los bosques de México. Madera y Bosques. 10(1):3-20. ISSN 2448-7597 https://doi.org/10.21829/myb.2004.1011276
MC CAUGHEY-ESPINOZA DM, Ayala Astorga GI, Velázquez-Caudillo J, Anaya-Islas J, Canseco-Vilchis E. 2017. Creación de un jardín botánico y de árbol madre de arbustivas forrajeras nativas del estado de Sonora. Rev. Idesia (Arica). 35(4):35-45. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-34292017000400035
MC CAUGHEY-ESPINOZA DM, Ayala-Astorga GI, Burboa Zazueta MG, Ochoa Meza A, Retes López R. 2019. Uso de plantas nativas para la rehabilitación de canteras en Sonora. Rev. Idesia (Arica). Volumen 26 (4) https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/so718-34292018005002401
MIRANDA J, Padilla F, Pugnaire F. 2004. Sucesión y restauración en ambientes semiáridos. Ecosistemas: Revista científica y técnica de ecología y medio ambiente. 13 (1): 55-58. ISSN 1697-2473
MONGIL J, Navarro J, Díaz V. 2015. Esquema ecológico aplicado a una restauración forestal en cárcavas de la Sierra de Ávila (centro de España). Madera y bosques, 21(1): 11-19. ISSN 2448-7597.
MONTERROSO-RIVAS AI, Gómez-Díaz JD, Tinoco-Rueda JA. 2009. Servicios ambientales hidrológicos bajo escenarios de cambio climático en el Parque Nacional “El Chico”, Hidalgo. Madera y Bosques. 15(2):5-26. <http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-04712009000200001&lng=es&nrm=iso>. ISSN 2448-7597.
MOYER–HENRY KA, Burton JW, Israel DW, Rufty TW. 2006. Nitrogen transfer between plants: A15N natural abundance study with crop and weed species. Plant. Soil. 282:7–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-005-3081-y
PADILLA RUIZ F, Pugnaire de Idaola F, Marín R, Hervás Muñoz M, Ortega Oller R. 2004. EL uso de Especies Arbustivas para la Restauración de la Cubierta Vegetal en Ambientes Semiáridos. Cuad. Soc. Esp. Cien. For. 17: 103-10. ISSN: 1575-2410
RESH SC, Binkley D, Parrotta JA. 2002. Greater soil carbon sequestration under nitrogen–fixing trees compared with Eucalyptus species. Ecosystems. 5:217–231. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-001-0067-3
SAGARHPA. Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganadería, Recursos Hidráulicos, Pesca y Acuacultura. 2016. Programa de mediano plazo 2016-2018.http://sagarhpa.sonora.gob.mx/portal_sagarhpa/images/archivos/PMP/PMPAGRICOLA20162021.pdf
SILVA ARROYAVE SM, Correa Restrepo FJ. 2009. Análisis de la Contaminación del Suelo: Revisión de la Normativa y Posibilidades de Regulación Económica. Semestre Económico. 12(23):13-34. ISSN 0120-6346
SIMIONI G, Gignoux J, Le Roux X, Appé R, Benest D. 2004. Spatial and temporal variations in leaf area index, specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen of two co-occurring savanna tree species. Tree Physiology 24: 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/24.2.205
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
