Application of response surface analysis to optimize the temperature-humidity relationship in broilers reared under commercial conditions

Authors

Keywords:

broiler, response surface analysis, temperature-humidity index

Abstract

The effects of changes in house temperature and relative humidity (RH) and their relationship on broiler production indicators in a commercial system with manual control of temperature and humidity were evaluated. Four production cycles were analyzed (26,000 birds/cycle; 10 broilers/m2). Each cycle consisted of four production phases (pre-starter, starter, grower and finisher). Feed and water were provided ad libitum. Six samples were taken from 120 birds per cycle in each phase, and body weight and daily weight gain were determined, as well as feed consumption and feed conversion ratio 1, phase 1 were estimated. The information was analyzed under fixed effects, principal components (PC) and response surface analysis (RSA) models. Temperatures and humidity were different (P<0.05) between cycles within each phase. Temperature and humidity affected (P<0.001) the productive indicators per cycle across phases. This was corroborated by the PC analysis (P<0.001). Meanwhile, the optimization process of the regression equations showed that the best combination of temperature and relative humidity was 29°C/31%, 26°C/35%, 25°C/35%, 30°C/44%, 14°C/64% y 18°C/50% and for weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 y 6, respectively.

http://dx.doi.org/10.21929/abavet2026.1     

e2025-106

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNxGYigfpy4

 

References

ARANTES DE SOUSA LF, Pegoraro EL, Alves de Almeida E, Lunedo R, Furlan RL, Macari M. 2016. How heat stress (continuous or cyclical) interferes with nutrient digestibility, energy and nitrogen balances and performance in Broilers. Livestock Science. 192:39-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2016.0814.0

AVIAGEN. 2022. Pollo de engorda ROSS 308 AP: objetivos de rendimiento. Aviagen EUA. https://aviagen.com/assets/Tech_Center/BB_Foreign_Language_Docs/Spanish_TechDocs-v2/RossxRoss308_BroilerPerformanceObjectives2022_ES.pdf

AYDAR AY. 2017. Utilization of response surface methodology in optimization of extraction of plant materials. In (Ed.), Statistical Approaches With Emphasis on Design of Experiments Applied to Chemical Processes. IntechOpen.

https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73690

CASSUCE D, Tinôco I, Baêta F, Zolnier S, Cecon P, Vieira MF. 2013. Thermal comfort temperature update for broiler chickens up to 21 days of age. Engenharia Agrícola. 33:28-36. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69162013000100004

COBB-VANTRESS, INC. 2022. Cobb500TM Pollo de Engorde: Suplemento informativo de rendimiento y nutrición. https://www.cobbgenetics.com/assets/Cobb-Files/2022-Cobb500-Broiler-Performance-Nutrition-Supplement.pdf

DESHAZER JA, Hahn GL, Xin H. 2009. Chapter 1: Basic Principles of the Thermal Environment and Livestock Energetics. In J.A. DeShazer (Ed.), Livestock Energetics and Thermal Environmental Management. 1-22. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASABE. ASABE # 801M0309. ISBN: 1-892769-74-3. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.28294

HAI L, Rong D, Zhang ZY. 2000. The Effect of environment on the digestion of Broilers. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 83:57-64.

https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0396.2000.00223.x

HASSAN FU, Alagawany M, Jha R. 2022. Editorial: Interplay of nutrition and genomics: Potential for improving performance and health of poultry. Frontiers in Physiology. 13:e1030995. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1030995

JONGBO AO. 2024. Effects of sidewall opening areas on the performance of broiler chickens and the indoor climatic conditions of backyard poultry building. Acta Scientiarum: Animal Sciences. 46:1-8.

https://doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v46i1.66396

KHURI A. 2017. Response surface methodology and its applications in agricultural and food sciences. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal. 5(5):155-163. https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00141

LITTELL CR, Milliken AG, Stroup WW, Wolfinger DR, Schabenberger O. 2006. SAS® for Mixed Models. 2da edición. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Pp. 733-735. https://es.scribd.com/document/916775419/SAS-for-Mixed-Models-2nd-ed-Edition-Ramon-C-Littell-instant-access-2025

LITTELL CR, Stroup WW, Freund JR. 2002. SAS® for Linear Models. Cuarta edición. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Pp. 191-194. https://typeset.io/pdf/sas-for-linear-models-4xf4c34car.pdf

MONTANERO FJ. 2008. Análisis multivariante. Universidad de Extremadura, Servicio de Publicaciones. ISBN: 978-84-691-6343-6.

https://dehesa.unex.es/entities/publication/5a590025-a7f4-4dd7-a986-b55874d4c071

MONTGOMERY D. 2002. Diseño y análisis de experimentos. 2da edición. México: Editorial Limusa. ISBN: 968-18-6156-6.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362079778_Design_and_Analysis_of_Experiments_9th_Edition

MUZZAMMIL M, Javed A, Zakwan M. 2015. An optimization technique for estimation of rating curve parameters. Indian Association of Hydrologists (IAH), Roorkee. Symposium on Hydrology, 22-23 diciembre 2015, Nueva Delhi, India. Pp. 234–240. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305767208_AN_OPTIMIZATION_TECHNIQUE_FOR_ESTIMATION_OF_RATING_CURVE_PARAMETERS

NILIPOUR A. 2012. Pollo moderno- cómo obtener el máximo rendimiento- Desafío, oportunidades y metas. http://www.engormix.com/MA-avicultura/manejo/articulos/pollo-moderno-como-obtener-t4082/124-p0.htm

OGUNLOWO QO, Adedayo AA, Wook HN, Anis R, Misbaudeen AA, Ezatullah Z, John AA, Bukola OA, Kosemani BS, Ilori TA, Lee HW. 2024. Analysis of microclimate temperature and relative humidity distribution of local poultry house in a subtropical area of Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 55(2):e1561.

https://doi.org/10.4081/jae.2024.1561

OMOMOWO O, Falayi F. 2021. Temperature-humidity index and thermal comfort of broilers in humid tropics. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR e-journal. 23:101-110. https://cigrjournal.org/index.php/Ejounral/article/view/6425/3677

PISHGAR-KOMLEH S, Keyhani A, Mostofi-Sarkari M, Jafari A. 2012. Application of response surface methodology for optimization of picker-husker harvesting losses in corn seed. Iranica Journal of Energy & Environment. 3(2):e64390.

https://www.ijee.net/article_64390.html

QUINTANA LJA. 2020. Manejo del pollo de engorda durante su primera semana de vida. Avicultores y su Entorno. BM Editores. Año 20, n.° 122.

https://bmeditores.mx/avicultura/manejo-del-pollo-de-engorda-durante-su-primera-semana-de-vida/

SÁNCHEZ-CHIPRÉS DR, Valera-Rojas M, Casasola-Torres RA, Gutiérrez-Borroto O, Mireles-Flores S. 2021. Atenuación del estrés calórico en pollos con la suplementación de un producto de cromo orgánico. Revista Colombiana de Ciencia Animal - RECIA. 13(1):e792. https://doi.org/10.24188/recia.v13.n1.2021.792

SONG Z, Liu L, Sheikhahmadi A, Jiao H, Lin H. 2012. Effect of heat exposure on gene expression of feed intake regulatory peptides in laying hens. Journal of Biomedicine and Biotechnology. 2012, e484869. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/484869

TAHERI A, Kenari AA, Motamedzadegan A, Habibi-Rezaei M. 2011. Poultry by-products and enzymatic hydrolysis: optimization by response surface methodology using alcalase® 2.4L. International Journal of Food Engineering. 7(5):e1969. https://doi.org/10.2202/1556-3758.1969

TAO X, Xin H. 2003. Acute synergistic effects of air temperature, humidity, and velocity on homeostasis of market-size broilers. Transactions of the ASAE. 46:e12971. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.12971

TORRES V, Ramos N, Lizazo D, Monteagudo F, Noda A. 2001. Modelo estadístico para la medición del impacto de la innovación o transferencia tecnológica en la rama agropecuaria. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola. 42(2):133-139.

https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=193015494003

WILLIAMS Y, Basitereb M, Ntwampea SKO, Ngonganga M, Njoyaa M, Kaskotea E. 2019. Application of response surface methodology to optimize the COD removal efficiency of an EGSB reactor treating poultry slaughterhouse wastewater. Water Practice and Technology. 14(3):507-514. https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2019.032

Published

2026-05-17

Issue

Section

Research Notes