<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1 20151215//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.1" specific-use="sps-1.9" xml:lang="es" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">av</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Abanico veterinario</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Abanico vet</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">2007-428X</issn>
			<issn pub-type="epub">2448-6132</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Sergio Martínez González</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21929/abavet2021.2</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="other">00101</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Artículos originales</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Coccidiosis en pollos de engorda comerciales en Brazil entre 2012 y 2019: especies principales y grados de daño</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-5118-3060</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Gazoni</surname>
						<given-names>Fabio</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-5308-5656</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Matte</surname>
						<given-names>Fabrizio</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-5894-8513</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Chiarelli-Adorno</surname>
						<given-names>Felipe</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-9253-9526</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Mariely-Jaguezeski</surname>
						<given-names>Antonise</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-2416-2747</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Tellez-Isaias</surname>
						<given-names>Guillermo</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-5459-3823</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Schafer-da-Silva</surname>
						<given-names>Aleksandro</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Vetanco do Brasil Imp. e Exp. LTDA, Chapecó, SC, Brazil</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Vetanco do Brasil</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<city>Chapecó</city>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Federal University of Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade Federal de Santa Maria</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Federal University of Santa Maria</institution>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff3">
				<label>3</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72704, United States of America.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">University of Arkansas</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Department of Poultry Science</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">University of Arkansas</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<city>Fayetteville</city>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="US">USA</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff4">
				<label>4</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Department of Animal Science, State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC), Chapecó, Brazil.</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Department of Animal Science</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC)</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<city>Chapecó</city>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c1">
					<label>*</label>Autor para correspondencia: Rua Raimundo Zanella, 400D - Distrito Industrial Flávio Baldissera - CEP 89813-824. Chapecó, Brazil. <email>gazoni@vetanco.com.br</email>, <email>fabrizio@vetanco.com.br</email>, <email>chiarelli@vetanco.com.br,</email>
					<email>antonise.jaguezeski@gmail.com</email>, <email>gtellez@uark.edu,</email>
					<email>aleksandro_ss@yahoo.com.br</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="other" id="fn1">
					<p>Clave: 2020-86.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>30</day>
				<month>04</month>
				<year>2021</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">
				<season>Jan-Feb</season>
				<year>2021</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>11</volume>
			
			<elocation-id>e101</elocation-id>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>22</day>
					<month>05</month>
					<year>2020</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>22</day>
					<month>12</month>
					<year>2020</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" xml:lang="es">
					<license-p>Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>RESUMEN:</title>
				<p>El propósito del presente estudio fue determinar la frecuencia de la coccidiosis en pollos de engorde, detectar las especies más comunes de <italic>Eimeria</italic> spp y cargas parasitarias en aves comerciales en Brasil de 2012 a 2019. Estudiamos 13,648 aves entre 9 y 49 días de edad en 82 empresas en 13 estados brasileños. Las aves se seleccionaron al azar (3 a 6 aves / aviario) y se sacrificaron por eutanasia. Se analizaron las lesiones macroscópicas y se raspó la mucosa intestinal para el conteo de ooquistes de <italic>E. maxima</italic>. La clasificación de especies se basó en el tamaño de los ooquistes. También cuantificamos la carga infecciosa mediante un sistema de puntuación. Se detectó coccidiosis subclínica (<italic>E. maxima</italic> micro) en un promedio de 34.8%. <italic>E. acervulina</italic> (16.1%), <italic>E. maxima</italic> (7.9%) y <italic>E. tenella</italic> (4.1%) también se identificaron con fluctuaciones anuales. El conteo de ooquistes estuvo dentro de la puntuación 1 (1 a 10 ooquistes / ave) en el 47.5 al 84.4% de los casos; seguido de una puntuación 2 (11 a 20), 3 (21 a 40) y 4 (más de 41 ooquistes / ave). La coccidiosis subclínica es motivo de preocupación, ya que 3.5 de cada diez aves estaban infectadas. Este es un factor responsable del menor rendimiento productivo de los pollos de engorde.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
				<title>Palabras clave:</title>
				<kwd>Coccidiosis</kwd>
				<kwd>Eimeria acervulina</kwd>
				<kwd>Eimeria maxima</kwd>
				<kwd>Eimeria tenella</kwd>
				<kwd>prevalencia</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="4"/>
				<table-count count="4"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="29"/>
				<page-count count="0"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>INTRODUCCIÓN</title>
			<p>En la cría de aves de corral comercial e intensiva, <italic>Eimeria</italic> spp., son un protozoo ubicuo, muy extendido en seis continentes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chapman <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Clark <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>). Se han reconocido siete especies de <italic>Eimeria</italic> (<italic>E</italic>. <italic>acervulina</italic>, <italic>E</italic>. <italic>brunetti</italic>, <italic>E</italic>. <italic>maxima</italic>, <italic>E</italic>. <italic>mitis</italic>, <italic>E</italic>. <italic>necatrix</italic>, <italic>E</italic>. <italic>praecox</italic> y <italic>E</italic>. <italic>tenella</italic>). Se diferencian en patogenicidad (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">McDougald, 2008</xref>). Las aves infectadas por <italic>Eimeria</italic> pueden reducir el rendimiento del crecimiento a través de la función intestinal deteriorada (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kim <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lu <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). Más comúnmente, las aves permanecen asintomáticas hasta que hay una infección por un gran número de coccidios o alguna otra patología agravante (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Williams, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chapman <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Gazoni <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>). A principios de la década de 2000 se estimó que la enfermedad tenía un impacto económico anual de aproximadamente US $ 3 mil millones, con pérdidas para los productores y la industria avícola mundial (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Dalloul y Lillehoj, 2006</xref>). En Rumanía, en 2016, los investigadores encontraron que las pérdidas económicas totales por cada 24 manadas de 18.000 pollitos fueron de aproximadamente 37.948,2 €, con una media de 3.162,4 € por manada. Estas pérdidas fueron causadas por la mortalidad (34,8%) y la mala conversión alimenticia (65,2%) debido a la coccidiosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Györke <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>).</p>
			<p>Tradicionalmente, el diagnóstico de las granjas se da a través de la detección y enumeración de ooquistes excretados en las heces, además de medir las dimensiones de las aves. Los investigadores post-mortem evalúan la porción intestinal afectada y las lesiones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Long y Joyner, 1984</xref>). El diagnóstico específico de infecciones por <italic>Eimeria</italic> en pollos de engorde es fundamental para una mejor comprensión de la epidemiología y dinámica de la enfermedad y es necesario para la prevención, vigilancia y control efectivo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Morris and Gasser, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Gazoni <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>).</p>
			<p>La coccidiosis subclínica se observa comúnmente en granjas avícolas en Brasil, y un diagnóstico preciso es esencial para rastrear las intervenciones, principalmente debido a problemas con la resistencia a los agentes coccidiostáticos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Gazoni <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). Por lo tanto, el objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la ocurrencia anual de la infección por <italic>Eimeria</italic> en pollos de engorde industriales de 2012 a 2019 en Brazil.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS</title>
			<sec>
				<title>Animales y recopilación de datos</title>
				<p>El seguimiento de la coccidiosis se llevó a cabo en 82 empresas de los estados de Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Paraná, Mato Grosso do Sul, São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, Goiás, Distrito Federal, Alagoas, Para, Paraiba y Pernambuco de 2012 y 2019, utilizando 13,648 pollos de engorde. Brasil es un país continental con una variación climática muy particular para cada estado, por lo que no se planteó en consideración de información climática. Los datos fueron divulgados por el Programa de Salud Intestinal (PSI) de Vetanco do Brasil, con el fin de obtener el porcentaje de aves afectadas y su grado de clasificación por puntajes de lesión en colaboración con investigadores de la Universidad Estatal de Santa Catarina (UDESC). Las aves eran de las líneas Cobb 500 y Aviagen y tenían entre 9 y 49 días de edad. Se les suministró piensos preparados por sus respectivas empresas, sin ninguna interferencia del evaluador en términos de formulación o uso de potenciadores del rendimiento y agentes anticoccidiales. El programa anticoccidial más utilizado es el sistema dual, en el que se utiliza un ingrediente activo en la primera fase (del 1º al 21º día de edad) y otro en la segunda fase (del 22º día a 3 días antes del sacrificio), los pollos de engorde No recibir programas de vacunas contra la coccidiosis, con el fin de reducir la posibilidad de aparición de resistencias antimicrobianas.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Colección de muestra</title>
				<p>Monitoreamos la salud intestinal de los pollos de engorde usando de 3 a 6 aves por lote (aviario). Las aves se seleccionaron al azar de tres puntos diferentes en el aviario (entrada, medio y fondo). Estas aves fueron sacrificadas por dislocación cervical, seguida de disección para recolección de muestras y evaluación visual.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Evaluación macroscópica de tejidos</title>
				<p>En el tracto gastrointestinal se observó la presencia de lesiones causadas por <italic>E</italic>. <italic>acervulina</italic>, <italic>E</italic>. <italic>maxima</italic> y <italic>E</italic>. <italic>tenella</italic>, por ejemplo, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">figura 1</xref>. Cuando estaban presentes, las lesiones se clasificaron según su grado de intensidad, según la metodología de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Johnson y Reid (1970)</xref>, donde la puntuación 0 indica la ausencia de lesión y la puntuación 4 indica daño severo.</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f1">
						<label>Figura 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Presencia de las lesiones causadas por <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, <italic>E. maxima</italic>, y <italic>E. tenella.</italic></title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2448-6132-av-11-e101-gf1.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Técnica de raspado de mucosas y recuento de ooquistes</title>
				<p>Para evaluar <italic>E</italic>. <italic>maxima</italic> micro, se utilizó la técnica de raspado de la mucosa intestinal para el recuento de ooquistes, realizada en la porción intestinal que rodea el divertículo de Meckel. El contenido fecal se depositó en un portaobjetos, se cubrió con un cubreobjetos y se visualizó en cinco campos (extremidades y centro) para contar ooquistes bajo microscopía óptica (100x). Se utilizaron cuatro puntajes para la clasificación, según Vetanco do Brasil (2011), donde el puntaje 0 representó ausencia de ooquistes; la puntuación 1 representó de 1 a 10 ooquistes; la puntuación 2 representó 11-20 ooquistes; la puntuación 3 representó 21-40 ooquistes, y la puntuación 4 significó más de 41 ooquistes, por ejemplo la <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">figura 2</xref> .</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f2">
						<label>Figura 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Se utilizaron cuatro puntajes para la clasificación de E. maxima micro</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="2448-6132-av-11-e101-gf2.gif"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>RESULTADOS</title>
			<p>La ocurrencia anual mostró diferencias significativas entre especies; mientras que uno era alto, los otros eran más pequeños en el año en cuestión. La coccidiosis subclínica tuvo la mayor incidencia (promedio de 34,8%) durante el período evaluado (2012- 2019), revelando una mayor frecuencia y diseminación en la industria avícola brasileña. Para las lesiones macroscópicas atribuidas a <italic>E</italic>. <italic>acervulina</italic>, <italic>E</italic>. <italic>maxima</italic> y <italic>E</italic>. <italic>tenella</italic>, la ocurrencia promedio fue de 16,1%, 7,9% y 4,1%, respectivamente. También observamos que ninguna de las especies de <italic>Eimeria</italic> mostró comportamiento lineal; en cambio, demostraron fluctuaciones a lo largo de los años: a veces, hubo un aumento. A veces, hubo una disminución en la ocurrencia (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Tabla 1</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>Cuadro 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Especies de <italic>Eimeria</italic> y porcentaje de eimeriosis en pollos de engorde entre 2012 a 2019</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left" rowspan="2">Especies</th>
								<th align="center" colspan="9">Ocurrencia anual (%)</th>
								
							</tr>
							<tr>
								
								<th align="left">2012</th>
								<th align="center">2013</th>
								<th align="right">2014</th>
								<th align="center">2015</th>
								<th align="center">2016</th>
								<th align="center">2017</th>
								<th align="center">2018</th>
								<th align="center">2019</th>
								<th align="center">Average</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
								<td align="left">9.3</td>
								<td align="center">18.7</td>
								<td align="right">13.6</td>
								<td align="center">13.5</td>
								<td align="center">30.5</td>
								<td align="center">16.6</td>
								<td align="center">17.1</td>
								<td align="center">9.7</td>
								<td align="center">16.1</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
								<td align="left">22.2</td>
								<td align="center">7.8</td>
								<td align="right">4.8</td>
								<td align="center">5.9</td>
								<td align="center">8.1</td>
								<td align="center">4.4</td>
								<td align="center">4.9</td>
								<td align="center">5.4</td>
								<td align="center">7.9</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
								<td align="left">10.0</td>
								<td align="center">5.0</td>
								<td align="right">4.1</td>
								<td align="center">2.0</td>
								<td align="center">4.5</td>
								<td align="center">2.3</td>
								<td align="center">1.7</td>
								<td align="center">3.1</td>
								<td align="center">4.1</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
								<td align="left">28.8</td>
								<td align="center">29.1</td>
								<td align="right">25.8</td>
								<td align="center">33.5</td>
								<td align="center">34.7</td>
								<td align="center">45.5</td>
								<td align="center">38.0</td>
								<td align="center">42.6</td>
								<td align="center">34.8</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Considerando cada especie a través de períodos, observamos que, en 2012, las ocurrencias de <italic>E</italic>. <italic>maxima</italic> (22.2%) y <italic>E</italic>. <italic>tenella</italic> (10.0%) fueron mayores y menores en los otros años. <italic>E</italic>. <italic>acervulina</italic> tuvo un aumento significativo en 2016, alcanzando el 30,5% de ocurrencia, con una disminución gradual a partir de esa fecha (9,7% en 2019). <italic>E. maxima</italic> micro mostró un crecimiento casi incremental hasta 2017 (del 28,8 al 45,5%), manteniéndose con un alto porcentaje anual en los años posteriores (38,0- 42,6%). Estos resultados se muestran en la <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Tabla 1</xref>.</p>
			<p>En cuanto a las puntuaciones de las lesiones, en todos los años prácticamente y para todas las especies, el recuento de ooquistes estuvo dentro de la puntuación 1, seguido de las puntuaciones 2, 3 y 4 (rara vez fue superior a 3, y cuando ocurrió, se observó para <italic>E</italic> .<italic>máxima</italic> micro). La puntuación 4 fue poco frecuente, lo que a menudo resulta en un valor nulo. El porcentaje entre especies y entre años no siguió un patrón. En cambio, varió para ambas especies y año (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Tabla 2</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t2">
					<label>Cuadro 2</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Porcentaje de puntajes de coccidiosis (Eimeria) obtenidos entre 2012 y 2019 en pollos de engorde de 9 a 49 días en la agroindustria brasileña</title>
					</caption>
					<table>
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center" rowspan="2">Año</th>
								<th align="center" rowspan="2">Especies</th>
								<th align="center" colspan="4">Puntuacion(%)</th>
								
							</tr>
						
						
							<tr>
								
								<th align="center">1</th>
								<th align="center">2</th>
								<th align="center">3</th>
								<th align="center">4</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2012</td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
								<td align="center">48.7</td>
								<td align="center">39.5</td>
								<td align="center">11.8</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
								<td align="center">56.1</td>
								<td align="center">35.6</td>
								<td align="center">7.2</td>
								<td align="center">1.1</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
								<td align="center">79.1</td>
								<td align="center">17.2</td>
								<td align="center">1.8</td>
								<td align="center">1.8</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
								<td align="center">73.0</td>
								<td align="center">9.8</td>
								<td align="center">9.4</td>
								<td align="center">7.9</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2013</td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
								<td align="center">57.0</td>
								<td align="center">32.9</td>
								<td align="center">9.0</td>
								<td align="center">1.1</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
								<td align="center">69.1</td>
								<td align="center">24.1</td>
								<td align="center">5.8</td>
								<td align="center">1.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
								<td align="center">84.4</td>
								<td align="center">12.3</td>
								<td align="center">3.3</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
								<td align="center">58.8</td>
								<td align="center">14.4</td>
								<td align="center">7.8</td>
								<td align="center">19.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2014</td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
								<td align="center">65.9</td>
								<td align="center">26.5</td>
								<td align="center">7.6</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
								<td align="center">64.7</td>
								<td align="center">25.2</td>
								<td align="center">5.9</td>
								<td align="center">4.2</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">4.2</td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
								<td align="center">76.5</td>
								<td align="center">19.6</td>
								<td align="center">3.9</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
								<td align="center">65.3</td>
								<td align="center">14.6</td>
								<td align="center">4.2</td>
								<td align="center">15.9</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2015</td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
								<td align="center">62.2</td>
								<td align="center">27.4</td>
								<td align="center">8.9</td>
								<td align="center">1.5</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
								<td align="center">65.8</td>
								<td align="center">30.7</td>
								<td align="center">3.5</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
								<td align="center">69.2</td>
								<td align="center">17.9</td>
								<td align="center">12.8</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
								<td align="center">76.2</td>
								<td align="center">12.8</td>
								<td align="center">2.5</td>
								<td align="center">8.6</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2016</td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
								<td align="center">51.0</td>
								<td align="center">28.4</td>
								<td align="center">18.6</td>
								<td align="center">2.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
								<td align="center">59.3</td>
								<td align="center">33.3</td>
								<td align="center">3.7</td>
								<td align="center">3.7</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
								<td align="center">66.7</td>
								<td align="center">13.3</td>
								<td align="center">13.3</td>
								<td align="center">6.7</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
								<td align="center">70.7</td>
								<td align="center">14.7</td>
								<td align="center">7.8</td>
								<td align="center">6.9</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2017</td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
								<td align="center">81.1</td>
								<td align="center">13.8</td>
								<td align="center">5.1</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
								<td align="center">79.5</td>
								<td align="center">15.1</td>
								<td align="center">5.5</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
								<td align="center">57.9</td>
								<td align="center">31.6</td>
								<td align="center">10.5</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
								<td align="center">71.5</td>
								<td align="center">10.3</td>
								<td align="center">1.9</td>
								<td align="center">16.3</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2018</td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
								<td align="center">53.6</td>
								<td align="center">41.2</td>
								<td align="center">5.2</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
								<td align="center">66.7</td>
								<td align="center">28.3</td>
								<td align="center">5.0</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
								<td align="center">76.2</td>
								<td align="center">23.8</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
								<td align="center">84.2</td>
								<td align="center">6.4</td>
								<td align="center">2.3</td>
								<td align="center">7.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2019</td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
								<td align="center">75.8</td>
								<td align="center">18.7</td>
								<td align="center">5.5</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
								<td align="center">66.7</td>
								<td align="center">29.4</td>
								<td align="center">3.9</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
								<td align="center">65.5</td>
								<td align="center">34.5</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
								<td align="center">0.0</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
								<td align="center">47.5</td>
								<td align="center">22.5</td>
								<td align="center">2.5</td>
								<td align="center">27.5</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>DISCUSIÓN</title>
			<p>Reportamos la ocurrencia de coccidiosis en la industria avícola brasileña por más de siete años. Los estudios que informan las características epidemiológicas de la coccidiosis en Brasil son raros. Es importante prestar atención a las especies que se encuentran en el territorio; nuestros hallazgos concuerdan con los de otros autores que reportaron frecuentemente <italic>E</italic>. <italic>acervulina</italic>, <italic>E</italic>. <italic>maxima</italic> y <italic>E. tenella</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Moraes <italic>et al.,</italic> 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chapman <italic>et al.,</italic> 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kim <italic>et al.,</italic> 2017</xref>); estas especies, además de ser reportadas con mayor frecuencia, son las que comúnmente desarrollan resistencia a las drogas sintéticas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Shivaramaiah <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>).</p>
			<p>Todas las especies de <italic>Eimeria</italic> están muy extendidas en los seis continentes. Sin embargo, puede haber una división regional en la diversidad genética y la estructura poblacional de las especies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Prakashbabu <italic>et al.,</italic> 2017</xref>); o incluso, como describen <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Clark <italic>et al</italic>. (2016</xref>), puede haber variantes genéticas entre los hemisferios sur y norte, lo que representa un riesgo para la seguridad alimentaria y el bienestar animal si se propaga a áreas previamente ausentes. Se cree que esta variación es atribuible al uso de medicamentos y vacunas anticoccidiales (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Prakashbabu <italic>et al.,</italic> 2017</xref>).</p>
			<p>Un estudio sobre la prevalencia de coccidiosis en Santa Catarina (BR) mediante PCR mostró que el 96% de las fincas fueron positivas para <italic>Eimeria</italic>, con siete especies identificadas: <italic>E</italic>. <italic>maxima</italic> (63,7%) y <italic>E</italic>. <italic>acervulina</italic> (63,3%), <italic>E</italic>. <italic>tenella</italic> (54,6%), <italic>E</italic>. <italic>mitis</italic> (38,6%), <italic>E</italic>. <italic>praecox</italic> (25,1%), <italic>E</italic>. <italic>necatrix</italic> (24,3%) y <italic>E</italic>. <italic>brunetti</italic> (13,1%), con un promedio de 2,96 especies por explotación (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Moraes <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>). Otro estudio en una pequeña región del estado de Tocantins reportó la ocurrencia de coccidiosis en todas las granjas, con la presencia de <italic>E</italic>. <italic>maxima</italic>, <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, <italic>E</italic>. <italic>mitis</italic> y <italic>E</italic>. <italic>tenella</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Toledo <italic>et al</italic>., 2011</xref>). La alta preponderancia de una especie de <italic>Eimeria</italic> puede indicar su resistencia a los fármacos habitualmente expuestos, como es el caso de <italic>E</italic>. <italic>tenella</italic> estudiado en Nigeria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ojimelukwe <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>) <italic>E</italic>. <italic>maxima</italic> micro y <italic>E. acervulina</italic> en el presente estudio y el otros informaron en Brasil. El diagnóstico es importante y necesario para delinear estrategias, según <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Teeter <italic>et al.</italic> (2008)</xref>, se observó que por cada punto de aumento en la evaluación microscópica de las lesiones de coccidiosis, el aumento de peso diario disminuyó un 1,5% del peso corporal (g) durante el período de desafío de seis días. Por tanto, es fundamental conocer el grado de daño intestinal para cuantificar el rendimiento de las aves.</p>
			<p>El ciclo de replicación intestinal rápido (4 a 6 días) y la vía oral/fecal hacen de la coccidiosis un problema severo de reproducción intensiva, causado por infecciones recurrentes y resistencia a agentes coccidiostáticos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Shivaramaiah <italic>et al.,</italic> 2014</xref>). Sin un control efectivo, el número de parásitos puede aumentar hasta el punto de producir coccidiosis clínica. Para evitar resistencias, se llevan a cabo programas de rotación de fármacos y vacunación (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Lan <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>). La rotación de agentes coccidiostáticos puede ayudar a esclarecer las oscilaciones significativas de ocurrencia entre especies de <italic>Eimeria</italic>, como se verifica en este estudio.</p>
			<p>La vacunación es la medida profiláctica más interesante; sin embargo, solo se utiliza en reproductoras de pollos de engorde (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdul Rasheed y Matsler, 2020</xref>) y gallinas ponedoras (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chapman <italic>et al.,</italic> 2014</xref>). La vacunación comercial <italic>in ovo</italic> contra la coccidiosis en pollos de engorde se ha vuelto ampliamente aceptada en la industria avícola de EE. UU sin embargo, sus efectos sobre el rendimiento aún no se han estudiado (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sokale <italic>et al.,</italic> 2020</xref>). Es fundamental enfatizar la importancia de los estudios de prevalencia de especies para el desarrollo de vacunas regionales, como en este estudio. Se ha analizado el uso de antimicrobianos con miras a reemplazarlos para evitar el problema de resistencias y se han propuesto varias alternativas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kim <italic>et al.,</italic> 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bortoluzzi <italic>et al.,</italic> 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lu <italic>et al.,</italic> 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Park <italic>et al.,</italic> 2020</xref>). La baja cantidad de ooquistes presentes en las muestras de este estudio (puntuación 1) y las pocas observaciones de la puntuación cero (sin ooquistes/muestra) pueden indicar la eficacia del uso estratégico de anticoccidiales químicos a través de piensos.</p>
			<p>Además de la pérdida de rendimiento, la coccidiosis es un factor predisponente para una patología aún más dañina en las aves, como la enteritis necrótica (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Williams, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Adhikari <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). La presencia de <italic>E</italic>. <italic>maxima</italic> fue considerada por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Paiva y McElroy (2014)</xref> como un factor de riesgo esencial para la promoción de <italic>Clostridium perfringens</italic>, y esto debe ser considerado en la búsqueda de métodos de control efectivos para las granjas en Brasil.</p>
			<p>Para el monitoreo del rebaño, la técnica de visualización de mucosas y recuento de ooquistes y clasificación sigue siendo la más viable para la agroindustria brasileña, en detrimento de la prueba qPCR, también disponible para diagnóstico y cuantificación (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Velkers <italic>et al.,</italic> 2010</xref>). Esto aumentaría considerablemente el seguimiento y requeriría un cuidado diferencial de las muestras.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>CONCLUSIONES</title>
			<p>En conclusión, la coccidiosis subclínica tiene una prevalencia preocupante, ya que 3,5 de cada diez aves tienen coccidiosis. Este es uno de los factores que probablemente causa reducciones en el desempeño productivo de los lotes de pollos de engorde, además de ser un factor predisponente para la clostridiosis. Debido a que los intentos de erradicar el parásito mediante cuarentena, desinfección y saneamiento no han tenido éxito (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">McDougald, 2008</xref>), es de fundamental importancia que los profesionales del sector avícola realicen evaluaciones subclínicas de coccidiosis de manera rutinaria, pudiendo así intervenir si es necesario, para mantener el desempeño productivo de los pollos de engorde.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ref-list>
			<title>LITERATURA CITADA</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Abdul Rasheed MS, Matsler PL. 2020. Assessment of protection against <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> in broiler breeders conferred by a live anticoccidial vaccine and effects of vaccination on early pullet growth. <italic>Journal Applied of Poultry Research</italic>. 29(2):447-454. ISSN: 1056-6171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2020.02.002</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Abdul Rasheed</surname>
							<given-names>MS</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Matsler</surname>
							<given-names>PL.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Assessment of protection against Eimeria tenella in broiler breeders conferred by a live anticoccidial vaccine and effects of vaccination on early pullet growth</article-title>
					<source>Journal Applied of Poultry Research</source>
					<volume>29</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>447</fpage>
					<lpage>454</lpage>
					<issn>1056-6171</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.japr.2020.02.002</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>Adhikari P, Kiess A, Adhikari R, Jha R. 2020. An approach to alternative strategies to control avian coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis. <italic>Journal Applied of Poultry Research</italic>. 29(2):515-534. ISSN: 1056-6171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japr.2019.11.005</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Adhikari</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kiess</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Adhikari</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jha</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>An approach to alternative strategies to control avian coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis</article-title>
					<source>Journal Applied of Poultry Research</source>
					<volume>29</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>515</fpage>
					<lpage>534</lpage>
					<issn>1056-6171</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.japr.2019.11.005</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Bortoluzzi C, Fernandes JIM, Doranalli K, Applegate TJ. 2019. Effects of dietary amino acids in ameliorating intestinal function during enteric challenges in broiler chickens. <italic>Animal Feed Science and Technology</italic>. 262:114383. ISSN: 0377-8401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114383</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bortoluzzi</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fernandes</surname>
							<given-names>JIM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Doranalli</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Applegate</surname>
							<given-names>TJ.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Effects of dietary amino acids in ameliorating intestinal function during enteric challenges in broiler chickens</article-title>
					<source>Animal Feed Science and Technology</source>
					<volume>262</volume>
					<fpage>114383</fpage>
					<lpage>114383</lpage>
					<issn>0377-8401</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.114383</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Chapman HD, Jeffers TK. 2014. Vaccination of chickens against coccidiosis ameliorates drug resistance in commercial poultry production. <italic>International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance</italic>. 4(3):214-217. ISSN: 0020-7519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpddr.2014.10.002</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chapman</surname>
							<given-names>HD</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jeffers</surname>
							<given-names>TK.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Vaccination of chickens against coccidiosis ameliorates drug resistance in commercial poultry production</article-title>
					<source>International Journal for Parasitology: Drugs and Drug Resistance</source>
					<volume>4</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>214</fpage>
					<lpage>217</lpage>
					<issn>0020-7519</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpddr.2014.10.002</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Chapman HD, Barta JR, Hafeez MA, Matsler P, Rathinam T, Raccoursier M. 2016. The epizootiology of <italic>Eimeria</italic> infections in commercial broiler chickens where anticoccidial drug programs were employed in six successive flocks to control coccidiosis. <italic>Poultry Science</italic>. 95(8):1774-1778. ISSN: 0032-5791. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew091</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chapman</surname>
							<given-names>HD</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barta</surname>
							<given-names>JR</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hafeez</surname>
							<given-names>MA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Matsler</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rathinam</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Raccoursier</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>The epizootiology of Eimeria infections in commercial broiler chickens where anticoccidial drug programs were employed in six successive flocks to control coccidiosis</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>95</volume>
					<issue>8</issue>
					<fpage>1774</fpage>
					<lpage>1778</lpage>
					<issn>0032-5791</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pew091</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Clark EL, Macdonald SE, Thenmozhi V, Kundu K, Garg G, Kumar S, Nolan MJ, Sudhakar NR, Adebambo AO, Lawal IA, Álvarez Zapata R, Awuni JA, Chapman HD, Karimuribo E, Mugasa CM, Namangala B, Rushton J, Sao X, Kumarasamy Thangaraj, Srinivasa Rao AS, Tewari AK, Banerjee PS, Raj GD, Raman M, Tomley FM, Blake DP. 2016. Cryptic <italic>Eimeria</italic> genotypes are common across the southern but not northern hemisphere. <italic>International Journal for Parasitology</italic>. 46(9):537-544. ISSN: 0020-7519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.05.006</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Clark</surname>
							<given-names>EL</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Macdonald</surname>
							<given-names>SE</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Thenmozhi</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kundu</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Garg</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kumar</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nolan</surname>
							<given-names>MJ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sudhakar</surname>
							<given-names>NR</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Adebambo</surname>
							<given-names>AO</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lawal</surname>
							<given-names>IA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Álvarez Zapata</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Awuni</surname>
							<given-names>JA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chapman</surname>
							<given-names>HD</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Karimuribo</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mugasa</surname>
							<given-names>CM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Namangala</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rushton</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sao</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Thangaraj</surname>
							<given-names>Kumarasamy</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Srinivasa Rao</surname>
							<given-names>AS</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tewari</surname>
							<given-names>AK</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Banerjee</surname>
							<given-names>PS</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Raj</surname>
							<given-names>GD</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Raman</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tomley</surname>
							<given-names>FM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Blake</surname>
							<given-names>DP.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Cryptic Eimeria genotypes are common across the southern but not northern hemisphere</article-title>
					<source>International Journal for Parasitology</source>
					<volume>46</volume>
					<issue>9</issue>
					<fpage>537</fpage>
					<lpage>544</lpage>
					<issn>0020-7519</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijpara.2016.05.006</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Dalloul RA, Lillehoj HS. 2006. Poultry coccidiosis: recent advancements in control measures and vaccine development. <italic>Expert Review of Vaccines</italic>. 2006(5):143-163. ISSN: 1476-0584. https://doi.org/10.1586/14760584.5.1.143</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Dalloul</surname>
							<given-names>RA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lillehoj</surname>
							<given-names>HS.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Poultry coccidiosis: recent advancements in control measures and vaccine development</article-title>
					<source>Expert Review of Vaccines</source>
					<volume>2006</volume>
					<issue>5</issue>
					<fpage>143</fpage>
					<lpage>163</lpage>
					<issn>1476-0584</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1586/14760584.5.1.143</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Gazoni FL, Adorno FC, Matte F, Malta T, Felin MR, Urbano T, Zampar A, Hernandez- Velasco X, Tellez G. 2017. Study of the correlation between intestinal health and prevalence of coccidiosis in broiler chickens of brazilian agribusinesses between the years 2015 and 2016. <italic>International Journal of Poultry Science</italic>. 16(10):381-386. ISSN: 1682-8356. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijps.2017.381.386</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gazoni</surname>
							<given-names>FL</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Adorno</surname>
							<given-names>FC</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Matte</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Malta</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Felin</surname>
							<given-names>MR</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Urbano</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zampar</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hernandez- Velasco</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tellez</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Study of the correlation between intestinal health and prevalence of coccidiosis in broiler chickens of brazilian agribusinesses between the years 2015 and 2016</article-title>
					<source>International Journal of Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>16</volume>
					<issue>10</issue>
					<fpage>381</fpage>
					<lpage>386</lpage>
					<issn>1682-8356</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ijps.2017.381.386</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Gazoni FL, Adorno FC, Matte F, Alves AJ, Campagnoni IDP, Urbano T, da Silva AS. 2020. Correlation between intestinal health and coccidiosis prevalence in broilers in Brazilian agroindustries. <italic>Parasitology International</italic>. 76:102027. ISSN: 1383-5769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2019.102027</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Gazoni</surname>
							<given-names>FL</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Adorno</surname>
							<given-names>FC</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Matte</surname>
							<given-names>F</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Alves</surname>
							<given-names>AJ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Campagnoni</surname>
							<given-names>IDP</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Urbano</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>da Silva</surname>
							<given-names>AS.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Correlation between intestinal health and coccidiosis prevalence in broilers in Brazilian agroindustries</article-title>
					<source>Parasitology International</source>
					<volume>76</volume>
					<fpage>102027</fpage>
					<lpage>102027</lpage>
					<issn>1383-5769</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.parint.2019.102027</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Györke A, Kalmár Z, Pop, LM, Şuteu OL. 2016. The economic impact of infection with <italic>Eimeria</italic> spp. in broiler farms from Romania. <italic>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</italic>. 45(5):273-280. ISSN: 1806-9290. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016000500010</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Györke</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kalmár</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pop</surname>
							<given-names>LM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Şuteu</surname>
							<given-names>OL.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>The economic impact of infection with Eimeria spp. in broiler farms from Romania</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia</source>
					<volume>45</volume>
					<issue>5</issue>
					<fpage>273</fpage>
					<lpage>280</lpage>
					<issn>1806-9290</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1806-92902016000500010</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Johnson J, Reid WM. 1970. Anticoccidial Drugs: lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens. <italic>Experimental Parasitology</italic>. 28:30-36. ISSN: 0014-4894. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-4894(70)90063-9</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Johnson</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Reid</surname>
							<given-names>WM.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1970</year>
					<article-title>Anticoccidial Drugs: lesion scoring techniques in battery and floor-pen experiments with chickens</article-title>
					<source>Experimental Parasitology</source>
					<volume>28</volume>
					<fpage>30</fpage>
					<lpage>36</lpage>
					<issn>0014-4894</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0014-4894(70)90063-9</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Kim E, Leung H, Akhtar N, Li J, Barta JR, Wang Y, Kiarie E. 2017. Growth performance and gastrointestinal responses of broiler chickens fed corn-soybean meal diet without or with exogenous epidermal growth factor upon challenge with <italic>Eimeria</italic>. <italic>Poultry Science</italic>. 96(10):3676-3686. ISSN: 0032-5791. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex192</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>E</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leung</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Akhtar</surname>
							<given-names>N</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barta</surname>
							<given-names>JR</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kiarie</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Growth performance and gastrointestinal responses of broiler chickens fed corn-soybean meal diet without or with exogenous epidermal growth factor upon challenge with Eimeria</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>96</volume>
					<issue>10</issue>
					<fpage>3676</fpage>
					<lpage>3686</lpage>
					<issn>0032-5791</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pex192</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Lan LH, Sun B.B., Zuo BXZ, Chen XQ, Du AF. 2017. Prevalence and drug resistance of avian <italic>Eimeria</italic> species in broiler chicken farms of Zhejiang province, China. <italic>Poultry Science</italic>. 96(7):2104-2109. ISSN: 0032-5791. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew499</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lan</surname>
							<given-names>LH</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sun</surname>
							<given-names>B.B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zuo</surname>
							<given-names>BXZ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>XQ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Du</surname>
							<given-names>AF.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Prevalence and drug resistance of avian Eimeria species in broiler chicken farms of Zhejiang province, China</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>96</volume>
					<issue>7</issue>
					<fpage>2104</fpage>
					<lpage>2109</lpage>
					<issn>0032-5791</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pew499</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Long PL, Joyner LP. 1984. Problems in the identification of species of <italic>Eimeria</italic>. <italic>The Journal of Protozoology</italic>. 31(4):535-541. ISSN:1550-7408. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.1984.tb05498.x</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Long</surname>
							<given-names>PL</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Joyner</surname>
							<given-names>LP.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1984</year>
					<article-title>Problems in the identification of species of Eimeria</article-title>
					<source>The Journal of Protozoology</source>
					<volume>31</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>535</fpage>
					<lpage>541</lpage>
					<issn>1550-7408</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1550-7408.1984.tb05498.x</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Lu Z, Thanabalan A, Leung H, Akbari Moghaddam Kakhki R, Patterson R, Kiarie EG. 2019. The effects of feeding yeast bioactives to broiler breeders and/or their offspring on growth performance, gut development, and immune function in broiler chickens challenged with <italic>Eimeria</italic>. <italic>Poultry Science</italic>. 98(12):6411-6421. ISSN: 0032-5791. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez479</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lu</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Thanabalan</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leung</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Akbari Moghaddam Kakhki</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Patterson</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kiarie</surname>
							<given-names>EG.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>The effects of feeding yeast bioactives to broiler breeders and/or their offspring on growth performance, gut development, and immune function in broiler chickens challenged with Eimeria</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>98</volume>
					<issue>12</issue>
					<fpage>6411</fpage>
					<lpage>6421</lpage>
					<issn>0032-5791</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pez479</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>McDougald LR. 2008. “Protozoal infections”. In: Saif YM, Fadly AM, Glisson JR, McDougald LR, Nolan LK, Swayne DE. Editors. <italic>Diseases of Poultry</italic>. 12th ed. Ames, Iowa, Blackwell Publishing. Pp. 1067. ISBN-13:978-0-8138-0718-8</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>McDougald</surname>
							<given-names>LR.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<chapter-title>Protozoal infections</chapter-title>
					<person-group person-group-type="editor">
						<name>
							<surname>Saif</surname>
							<given-names>YM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fadly</surname>
							<given-names>AM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Glisson</surname>
							<given-names>JR</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McDougald</surname>
							<given-names>LR</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nolan</surname>
							<given-names>LK</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Swayne</surname>
							<given-names>DE.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<source>Diseases of Poultry</source>
					<edition>12</edition>
					<publisher-name>Ames, Iowa, Blackwell Publishing</publisher-name>
					<fpage>1067</fpage>
					<lpage>1067</lpage>
					<isbn>13:978-0-8138-0718-8</isbn>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Moraes JC, França M, Sartor AA, Bellato V, de Moura AB, Magalhães MDLB, Miletti LC. 2015. Prevalence of <italic>Eimeria</italic> spp. in broilers by multiplex PCR in the southern region of Brazil on two hundred and fifty farms. <italic>Avian Diseases</italic>. 59(2):277-281. ISSN: 0005-2086. https://doi.org/10.1637/10989-112014-Reg</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Moraes</surname>
							<given-names>JC</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>França</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sartor</surname>
							<given-names>AA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bellato</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>de Moura</surname>
							<given-names>AB</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Magalhães</surname>
							<given-names>MDLB</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Miletti</surname>
							<given-names>LC.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Prevalence of Eimeria spp. in broilers by multiplex PCR in the southern region of Brazil on two hundred and fifty farms</article-title>
					<source>Avian Diseases</source>
					<volume>59</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>277</fpage>
					<lpage>281</lpage>
					<issn>0005-2086</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1637/10989-112014-Reg</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Morris GM, Gasser RB. 2006. Biotechnological advances in the diagnosis of avian coccidiosis and the analysis of genetic variation in <italic>Eimeria</italic>. <italic>Biotechnology Advances</italic>. 24(6):590-603. ISSN: 0734-9750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.06.001</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Morris</surname>
							<given-names>GM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gasser</surname>
							<given-names>RB.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Biotechnological advances in the diagnosis of avian coccidiosis and the analysis of genetic variation in Eimeria</article-title>
					<source>Biotechnology Advances</source>
					<volume>24</volume>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<fpage>590</fpage>
					<lpage>603</lpage>
					<issn>0734-9750</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biotechadv.2006.06.001</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Ojimelukwe AE, Emedhem DE, Agu GO, Nduka FO, Abah AE. 2018. Populations of <italic>Eimeria tenella</italic> express resistance to commonly used anticoccidial drugs in southern Nigeria. <italic>International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine</italic>. 6(2):192-200. ISSN: 2314-4599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijvsm.2018.06.003</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ojimelukwe</surname>
							<given-names>AE</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Emedhem</surname>
							<given-names>DE</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Agu</surname>
							<given-names>GO</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Nduka</surname>
							<given-names>FO</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Abah</surname>
							<given-names>AE.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Populations of Eimeria tenella express resistance to commonly used anticoccidial drugs in southern Nigeria</article-title>
					<source>International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine</source>
					<volume>6</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>192</fpage>
					<lpage>200</lpage>
					<issn>2314-4599</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijvsm.2018.06.003</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Paiva D, McElroy A. 2014. Necrotic enteritis: applications for the poultry industry. <italic>Journal Applied of Poultry Research</italic>. 23:557-566. ISSN: 1056-6171. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2013-00925</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Paiva</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McElroy</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Necrotic enteritis: applications for the poultry industry</article-title>
					<source>Journal Applied of Poultry Research</source>
					<volume>23</volume>
					<fpage>557</fpage>
					<lpage>566</lpage>
					<issn>1056-6171</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/japr.2013-00925</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Park I, Lee Y, Goo D, Zimmerman NP, Smith AH, Rehberger T, Lillehoj HS. 2020. The effects of dietary <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> supplementation, as an alternative to antibiotics, on growth performance, intestinal immunity, and epithelial barrier integrity in broiler chickens infected with <italic>Eimeria maxima</italic>. <italic>Poultry Science</italic>. 99(2):725-733. ISSN: 0032- 5791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.002</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Park</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Goo</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zimmerman</surname>
							<given-names>NP</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Smith</surname>
							<given-names>AH</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rehberger</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lillehoj</surname>
							<given-names>HS.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>The effects of dietary Bacillus subtilis supplementation, as an alternative to antibiotics, on growth performance, intestinal immunity, and epithelial barrier integrity in broiler chickens infected with Eimeria maxima</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>99</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>725</fpage>
					<lpage>733</lpage>
					<isbn>0032-5791</isbn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.psj.2019.12.002</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Prakashbabu BC, Thenmozhi V, Limon G, Kundu K, Kumar S, Garg R, Banerjee PS, Clark EL, Srinivasa Rao ASR , Raj DG, Raman M, Banerjee PS , Tomley FM, Guitian J, Blake DP. 2017. <italic>Eimeria</italic> species occurrence varies between geographic regions and poultry production systems and may influence parasite genetic diversity. <italic>Veterinary Parasitology</italic>. 233:62-72. ISSN: 1873-2550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.12.003</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Prakashbabu</surname>
							<given-names>BC</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Thenmozhi</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Limon</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kundu</surname>
							<given-names>K</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kumar</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Garg</surname>
							<given-names>R</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Banerjee</surname>
							<given-names>PS</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Clark</surname>
							<given-names>EL</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Srinivasa Rao</surname>
							<given-names>ASR</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Raj</surname>
							<given-names>DG</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Raman</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Banerjee</surname>
							<given-names>PS</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tomley</surname>
							<given-names>FM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Guitian</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Blake</surname>
							<given-names>DP</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Eimeria species occurrence varies between geographic regions and poultry production systems and may influence parasite genetic diversity</article-title>
					<source>Veterinary Parasitology</source>
					<volume>233</volume>
					<fpage>62</fpage>
					<lpage>72</lpage>
					<issn>1873-2550</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.12.003</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>Shivaramaiah C, Barta RJ, Hernandez-Velasco X, Tellez G, Hargis BM. 2014. Coccidiosis: recent advancements in the immunobiology of <italic>Eimeria</italic> species, preventive measures, and the importance of vaccination as a control tool against these Apicomplexan parasites. <italic>Veterinary Medicine</italic>. 5:23-34. ISSN: 2230-2034. https://doi.org/10.2147/VMRR.S57839</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Shivaramaiah</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barta</surname>
							<given-names>RJ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hernandez-Velasco</surname>
							<given-names>X</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tellez</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hargis</surname>
							<given-names>BM.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Coccidiosis: recent advancements in the immunobiology of Eimeria species, preventive measures, and the importance of vaccination as a control tool against these Apicomplexan parasites</article-title>
					<source>Veterinary Medicine</source>
					<volume>5</volume>
					<fpage>23</fpage>
					<lpage>34</lpage>
					<issn>2230-2034</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2147/VMRR.S57839</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Sokale AO, Williams CJ, Triplett MD, Hoerr FJ, Peebles ED. 2020. Effects of stage of broiler embryo development on coccidiosis vaccine injection accuracy, and subsequent oocyst localization and hatchling quality. <italic>Poultry Science</italic>. 99(1):189-195. ISSN: 0032-5791. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez592</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sokale</surname>
							<given-names>AO</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Williams</surname>
							<given-names>CJ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Triplett</surname>
							<given-names>MD</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hoerr</surname>
							<given-names>FJ</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Peebles</surname>
							<given-names>ED.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Effects of stage of broiler embryo development on coccidiosis vaccine injection accuracy, and subsequent oocyst localization and hatchling quality</article-title>
					<source>Poultry Science</source>
					<volume>99</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>189</fpage>
					<lpage>195</lpage>
					<issn>0032-5791</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3382/ps/pez592</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>Teeter RG, Beker A, Brown C, Broussard C, Fitz-Coy S, Radu J, Newman L. (2008). Transforming coccidiosis-mediated lesion scores into production and calorific cost. Proc. 23rd World Poult. Congr., Brisbane, Australia. 29.06.2008-04.07.2008. Pp.18-21. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://wenku.baidu.com/view/9df3d94fe45c3b3567ec8ba4.html">https://wenku.baidu.com/view/9df3d94fe45c3b3567ec8ba4.html</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Teeter</surname>
							<given-names>RG</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Beker</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brown</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Broussard</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fitz-Coy</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Radu</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Newman</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<source>Transforming coccidiosis-mediated lesion scores into production and calorific cost</source>
					<conf-name>23World Poult. Congr</conf-name>
					<conf-loc>Brisbane, Australia</conf-loc>
					<fpage>18</fpage>
					<lpage>21</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://wenku.baidu.com/view/9df3d94fe45c3b3567ec8ba4.html">https://wenku.baidu.com/view/9df3d94fe45c3b3567ec8ba4.html</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Toledo GA, Almeida JDDM, Almeida KDS, Freitas FLDC. 2011. Coccidiosis in broiler chickens raised in the Araguaína region, State of Tocantins, Brazil. <italic>Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria</italic>. 20(3):249-252. ISSN 0103-846X. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-29612011000300014</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Toledo</surname>
							<given-names>GA</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Almeida</surname>
							<given-names>JDDM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Almeida</surname>
							<given-names>KDS</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Freitas</surname>
							<given-names>FLDC.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Coccidiosis in broiler chickens raised in the Araguaína region, State of Tocantins, Brazil</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterinaria</source>
					<volume>20</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>249</fpage>
					<lpage>252</lpage>
					<issn>0103-846X</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1984-29612011000300014</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Velkers FC, Blake DP , Graat EAM, Vernooij JCM, Bouma A, De Jong MCM Stegeman JA. 2010. Quantification of <italic>Eimeria acervulina</italic> in faeces of broilers: Comparison of McMaster oocyst counts from 24 h faecal collections and single droppings to real-time PCR from cloacal swabs. <italic>Veterinary Parasitology</italic>. 169(1-2):1-7. ISSN: 0304-4017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.001</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Velkers</surname>
							<given-names>FC</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Blake</surname>
							<given-names>DP</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Graat</surname>
							<given-names>EAM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vernooij</surname>
							<given-names>JCM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bouma</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>De Jong</surname>
							<given-names>MCM</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stegeman</surname>
							<given-names>JA.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>Quantification of Eimeria acervulina in faeces of broilers: Comparison of McMaster oocyst counts from 24 h faecal collections and single droppings to real-time PCR from cloacal swabs</article-title>
					<source>Veterinary Parasitology</source>
					<volume>169</volume>
					<issue>1-2</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>7</lpage>
					<issn>0304-4017</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.01.001</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Vetanco do Brasil. 2011. Programa de Saúde Intestinal. Padrão microscópio de escore para <italic>E. maxima</italic>. Pp. 20 -21. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.vetanco.com/br/publicacoes-tecnicas/">https://www.vetanco.com/br/publicacoes-tecnicas/</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>Vetanco do Brasil</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Programa de Saúde Intestinal</article-title>
					<source>Padrão microscópio de escore para E. maxima</source>
					<fpage>20 </fpage>
					<lpage>221</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.vetanco.com/br/publicacoes-tecnicas/">https://www.vetanco.com/br/publicacoes-tecnicas/</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>Williams RB. 2005. Intercurrent coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis of chickens: rational, integrated disease management by maintenance of gut integrity. <italic>Avian Pathology</italic>. 34(3):159-180. ISSN: 0307-9457. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450500112195</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Williams</surname>
							<given-names>RB.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Intercurrent coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis of chickens: rational, integrated disease management by maintenance of gut integrity</article-title>
					<source>Avian Pathology</source>
					<volume>34</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>159</fpage>
					<lpage>180</lpage>
					<issn>0307-9457</issn>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03079450500112195</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
	<sub-article article-type="translation" id="s1" xml:lang="en">
		<front-stub>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Original article</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Coccidiosis in commercial broilers in Brazil between 2012 and 2019: main species and degrees of injury</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<author-notes>
				<fn fn-type="other" id="fn2">
					<p>Code:2020-86</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT:</title>
				<p>The purpose of the present study was to determine the occurrence of coccidiosis in broilers, detect the most commonly occurring species of <italic>Eimeria</italic> spp, and parasitic burdens in industrial poultry in Brazil from 2012 to 2019. We studied 13,648 birds between 9-49 days of age at 82 companies in 13 Brazilian states. Birds were randomly selected (3-6 birds/aviary) and euthanized. Macroscopic lesions were analyzed, and the intestinal mucosa was scraped to count <italic>E. maxima</italic> oocysts. The classification of species was based on the size of the oocysts. We also quantified the infectious burden using a scoring system. Subclinical coccidiosis (<italic>E. maxima</italic> micro) was detected in an average of 34.8%, <italic>E. acervulina</italic> (16.1%), <italic>E. maxima</italic> (7.9%), and <italic>E. tenella</italic> (4.1%) were also identified with annual fluctuations. The count of oocysts was within score 1 (1-10 oocysts/bird) in 47.5-84.4% of the cases; followed by score 2 (11-20), 3 (21-40) and 4 (over 41 oocysts/bird). Subclinical coccidiosis is a cause for concern, with 3.5 out of every ten birds being infected. This is a factor responsible for the lower productive performance of broilers.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Keywords:</title>
				<kwd>Coccidiosis</kwd>
				<kwd>Eimeria acervulina</kwd>
				<kwd>Eimeria maxima</kwd>
				<kwd>Eimeria tenella</kwd>
				<kwd>prevalence</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
		</front-stub>
		<body>
			<sec sec-type="intro">
				<title>INTRODUCTION</title>
				<p>In commercial and intensive poultry breeding, <italic>Eimeria</italic> spp. are a ubiquitous protozoan, widespread on six continents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chapman <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Clark <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>). Seven species of <italic>Eimeria</italic> have been recognized (<italic>E. acervulina</italic>, <italic>E. brunetti</italic>, <italic>E. maxima</italic>, <italic>E. mitis</italic>, <italic>E. necatrix</italic>, <italic>E. praecox</italic>, and <italic>E. tenella</italic>). They differ in pathogenicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">McDougald, 2008</xref>). <italic>Eimeria</italic> infection birds can reduce growth performance via the impaired intestinal function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kim <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lu <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). More commonly, the birds remain asymptomatic until there is an infection by a large number of coccidia or some other aggravating pathology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Williams, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chapman <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Gazoni <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>). It was estimated in the early 2000s that the disease had an annual economic impact of approximately U.S. $3 billion, with losses to producers and the worldwide poultry industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Dalloul and Lillehoj, 2006</xref>). In Romania in 2016, researchers found that total economic losses per 24 flocks of 18,000 chicks were about €37,948.2, with an average of €3,162.4 per flock. These losses were caused by mortality (34.8%) and poor feed conversion (65.2%) due to coccidiosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Györke <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>).</p>
				<p>Traditionally, the diagnosis of farms occurs through the detection and enumeration of oocysts excreted in the feces, in addition to measuring bird dimensions. Post-mortem investigators evaluate the affected intestinal portion and the lesions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Long and Joyner, 1984</xref>). The specific diagnosis of <italic>Eimeria</italic> infections in broilers is fundamental to a better understanding of the disease's epidemiology and dynamics and is necessary for the prevention, surveillance, and effective control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Morris and Gasser, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Gazoni, <italic>et al</italic>. 2017</xref>).</p>
				<p>Subclinical coccidiosis is commonly seen in poultry farms in Brazil, and accurate diagnosis is essential for tracing interventions, mainly because of problems with resistance to coccidiostats agents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Gazoni <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). Therefore, this study's objective was to determine the annual occurrence of <italic>Eimeria</italic> infection in industrial broilers from 2012 to 2019 in Brazil.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
				<title>MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
				<sec>
					<title>Animals and data collection</title>
					<p>Monitoring of coccidiosis was carried out in 82 companies in the states of Rio Grande do Sul, Santa Catarina, Paraná, Mato Grosso do Sul, São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, Goiás, Distrito Federal, Alagoas, Para, Paraiba and Pernambuco from 2012 and 2019, using 13,648 broilers. Brazil is a continental country with a very particular climatic variation for each state, because of this, it was not raised in consideration of climatic information. The data were released by the Intestinal Health Program (PSI) of Vetanco do Brasil, in order to obtain the percentage of affected birds and their degree of classification by injury scores in collaboration with researchers from the State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC). The birds were from the Cobb 500 and Aviagen lines and were 9-49 days old. They were provided feed prepared by their respective companies, without any interference from the evaluator in terms of formulation or use of performance enhancers and anticoccidial agents. The most commonly used anticoccidial program is the dual system, where an active ingredient is used in the first phase (1<sup>st</sup> to 21<sup>st</sup> day of age), and another is used in the second phase (22<sup>nd</sup> day to 3 days before slaughter), the broilers do not receive vaccines programs coccidiosis, in order to reduce the possibility of the appearance of antimicrobial resistance.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Sample collection</title>
					<p>We monitored the intestinal health of broilers using 3-6 birds per flock (aviary). Birds were randomly selected from three different points in the aviary (entrance, middle, and bottom). These birds were euthanized by cervical dislocation, followed by dissection for sample collection and visual evaluation.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Macroscopic tissue evaluation</title>
					<p>In the gastrointestinal tract, the presence of lesions caused by <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, <italic>E. maxima</italic>, and <italic>E. tenella</italic> was observed, for example <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">figure 1</xref>. When present, lesions were classified according to their degree of intensity, according to the methodology of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Johnson and Reid (1970)</xref>, where the score 0 indicates the absence of injury, and score 4 indicates severe damage.</p>
					<p>
						<fig id="f3">
							<label>Figure 1</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Presence of lesions caused by <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, <italic>E. maxima</italic>, and <italic>E. tenella.</italic></title>
							</caption>
							<graphic xlink:href="2448-6132-av-11-e101-gf3.gif"></graphic>
						</fig>
					</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>Mucosa scraping technique and oocyst count</title>
					<p>To evaluate <italic>E. maxima</italic> micro, the intestinal mucosa scraping technique was used to count oocysts, performed in the intestinal portion surrounding Meckel's diverticulum. The fecal content was deposited on a slide, covered by a coverslip, and visualized in five fields (extremities and center) for counting oocysts under optical microscopy (100x). Four scores were used for the classification, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Vetanco do Brasil (2011)</xref>, where score 0 represented absence of oocysts; score 1 represented 1-10 oocysts; score 2 represented 11-20 oocysts; score 3 represented 21-40 oocysts, and score 4 meant more than 41 oocysts, for example <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">figure 2</xref> .</p>
					<p>
						<fig id="f4">
							<label>Figure 2</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Four scores were used for the classification for <italic>E. maxima</italic> micro.</title>
							</caption>
							<graphic xlink:href="2448-6132-av-11-e101-gf4.gif"/>
						</fig>
					</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="results">
				<title>RESULTS</title>
				<p>The annual occurrence showed significant differences between species; while one was high, the others were smaller in the year in question. Subclinical coccidiosis had the most increased occurrence (average of 34.8%) during the evaluated period (2012- 2019), revealing greater frequency and dissemination in the Brazilian poultry industry. For macroscopic lesions attributed to <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, <italic>E. maxima</italic>, and <italic>E. tenella</italic>, the average occurrence was 16.1%, 7.9%, and 4.1%, respectively. We also observed that none of the <italic>Eimeria</italic> species showed linear behavior; instead, they demonstrated fluctuations across years: sometimes, there was an increase. Sometimes, there was a decrease in occurrence (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 1</xref>).</p>
				<p>Considering each species across periods, we observed that, in 2012, the occurrences of <italic>E. maxima</italic> (22.2%) and <italic>E. tenella</italic> (10.0%) were higher, and they were lower in the other years. <italic>E. acervulina</italic> had a significant increase in 2016, reaching 30.5% of occurrence, with a gradual decrease after that date (9.7% in 2019). <italic>E. maxima micro</italic> showed almost incremental growth until 2017 (from 28.8 to 45.5%), remaining with a high annual percentage in the subsequent years (38.0-42.6%). These results are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 1</xref>.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t3">
						<label>Table 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title><italic>Eimeria</italic> species and percentage of eimeriosis in broilers between 2012 to 2019.</title>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left" rowspan="2">Species</th>
									<th align="center" colspan="9">Annual ocurrence (%)</th>
									
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									
									<td align="left">2012</td>
									<td align="center">2013</td>
									<td align="right">2014</td>
									<td align="center">2015</td>
									<td align="center">2016</td>
									<td align="center">2017</td>
									<td align="center">2018</td>
									<td align="center">2019</td>
									<td align="center">Average</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
									<td align="left">9.3</td>
									<td align="center">18.7</td>
									<td align="right">13.6</td>
									<td align="center">13.5</td>
									<td align="center">30.5</td>
									<td align="center">16.6</td>
									<td align="center">17.1</td>
									<td align="center">9.7</td>
									<td align="center">16.1</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
									<td align="left">22.2</td>
									<td align="center">7.8</td>
									<td align="right">4.8</td>
									<td align="center">5.9</td>
									<td align="center">8.1</td>
									<td align="center">4.4</td>
									<td align="center">4.9</td>
									<td align="center">5.4</td>
									<td align="center">7.9</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
									<td align="left">10.0</td>
									<td align="center">5.0</td>
									<td align="right">4.1</td>
									<td align="center">2.0</td>
									<td align="center">4.5</td>
									<td align="center">2.3</td>
									<td align="center">1.7</td>
									<td align="center">3.1</td>
									<td align="center">4.1</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
									<td align="left">28.8</td>
									<td align="center">29.1</td>
									<td align="right">25.8</td>
									<td align="center">33.5</td>
									<td align="center">34.7</td>
									<td align="center">45.5</td>
									<td align="center">38.0</td>
									<td align="center">42.6</td>
									<td align="center">34.8</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>In terms of lesion scores, in practically every year and for all species, the oocyst count was within score 1, followed by scores 2, 3, and 4 (this was rarely higher than 3, and when it occurred, it was observed for <italic>E. maxima micro</italic>). Score 4 was infrequent, often resulting in a null value. The percentage between species and between years did not follow a pattern. Instead it varied for both species and year (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 2</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t4">
						<label>Table 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Percentage of coccidiosis scores (<italic>Eimeria</italic>) obtained between 2012 and 2019 in broilers from 9 to 49 days in Brazilian agribusiness.</title>
						</caption>
						<table>
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								
							
							<tr>
									<th align="center">Year</th>
									<th align="center">Species</th>
									<th align="center" colspan="4">Score(%)</th>
									
								</tr>
							
								<tr>
									<th align="center"> </th>
									<th align="center"> </th>
									<th align="center">1</th>
									<th align="center">2</th>
									<th align="center">3</th>
									<th align="center">4</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">2012</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
									<td align="center">48.7</td>
									<td align="center">39.5</td>
									<td align="center">11.8</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
									<td align="center">56.1</td>
									<td align="center">35.6</td>
									<td align="center">7.2</td>
									<td align="center">1.1</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
									<td align="center">79.1</td>
									<td align="center">17.2</td>
									<td align="center">1.8</td>
									<td align="center">1.8</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
									<td align="center">73.0</td>
									<td align="center">9.8</td>
									<td align="center">9.4</td>
									<td align="center">7.9</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">2013</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
									<td align="center">57.0</td>
									<td align="center">32.9</td>
									<td align="center">9.0</td>
									<td align="center">1.1</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
									<td align="center">69.1</td>
									<td align="center">24.1</td>
									<td align="center">5.8</td>
									<td align="center">1.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
									<td align="center">84.4</td>
									<td align="center">12.3</td>
									<td align="center">3.3</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
									<td align="center">58.8</td>
									<td align="center">14.4</td>
									<td align="center">7.8</td>
									<td align="center">19.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">2014</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
									<td align="center">65.9</td>
									<td align="center">26.5</td>
									<td align="center">7.6</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
									<td align="center">64.7</td>
									<td align="center">25.2</td>
									<td align="center">5.9</td>
									<td align="center">4.2</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">4.2</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
									<td align="center">76.5</td>
									<td align="center">19.6</td>
									<td align="center">3.9</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
									<td align="center">65.3</td>
									<td align="center">14.6</td>
									<td align="center">4.2</td>
									<td align="center">15.9</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">2015</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
									<td align="center">62.2</td>
									<td align="center">27.4</td>
									<td align="center">8.9</td>
									<td align="center">1.5</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
									<td align="center">65.8</td>
									<td align="center">30.7</td>
									<td align="center">3.5</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
									<td align="center">69.2</td>
									<td align="center">17.9</td>
									<td align="center">12.8</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
									<td align="center">76.2</td>
									<td align="center">12.8</td>
									<td align="center">2.5</td>
									<td align="center">8.6</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">2016</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
									<td align="center">51.0</td>
									<td align="center">28.4</td>
									<td align="center">18.6</td>
									<td align="center">2.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
									<td align="center">59.3</td>
									<td align="center">33.3</td>
									<td align="center">3.7</td>
									<td align="center">3.7</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
									<td align="center">66.7</td>
									<td align="center">13.3</td>
									<td align="center">13.3</td>
									<td align="center">6.7</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
									<td align="center">70.7</td>
									<td align="center">14.7</td>
									<td align="center">7.8</td>
									<td align="center">6.9</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">2017</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
									<td align="center">81.1</td>
									<td align="center">13.8</td>
									<td align="center">5.1</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
									<td align="center">79.5</td>
									<td align="center">15.1</td>
									<td align="center">5.5</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
									<td align="center">57.9</td>
									<td align="center">31.6</td>
									<td align="center">10.5</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
									<td align="center">71.5</td>
									<td align="center">10.3</td>
									<td align="center">1.9</td>
									<td align="center">16.3</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">2018</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
									<td align="center">53.6</td>
									<td align="center">41.2</td>
									<td align="center">5.2</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
									<td align="center">66.7</td>
									<td align="center">28.3</td>
									<td align="center">5.0</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
									<td align="center">76.2</td>
									<td align="center">23.8</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
									<td align="center">84.2</td>
									<td align="center">6.4</td>
									<td align="center">2.3</td>
									<td align="center">7.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">2019</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. acervulina</italic></td>
									<td align="center">75.8</td>
									<td align="center">18.7</td>
									<td align="center">5.5</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima</italic></td>
									<td align="center">66.7</td>
									<td align="center">29.4</td>
									<td align="center">3.9</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. tenella</italic></td>
									<td align="center">65.5</td>
									<td align="center">34.5</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
									<td align="center">0.0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><italic>E. maxima,</italic> micro</td>
									<td align="center">47.5</td>
									<td align="center">22.5</td>
									<td align="center">2.5</td>
									<td align="center">27.5</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="discussion">
				<title>DISCUSSION</title>
				<p>We reported the occurrence of coccidiosis in the Brazilian poultry industry for over seven years. Studies reporting epidemiological characteristics for coccidiosis in Brazil are rare. It is important to pay attention to the species found in the territory; our findings agree with those of other authors who frequently reported <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, <italic>E. maxima</italic> and <italic>E. tenella</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Moraes <italic>et al.,</italic> 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chapman <italic>et al.,</italic> 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kim <italic>et al.,</italic> 2017</xref>); these species, in addition to being reported most commonly, are the ones that commonly develop resistance to synthetic drugs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Shivaramaiah <italic>et al.</italic>, 2014</xref>).</p>
				<p>All species of <italic>Eimeria</italic> are widespread on the six continents. However, there may be a regional division in the genetic diversity and population structure of species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Prakashbabu <italic>et al.,</italic> 2017</xref>); or even, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Clark <italic>et al</italic>. (2016)</xref>, there may be genetic variants between the southern and northern hemispheres, representing a risk to food security and animal welfare if it spreads to previously absent areas. This variation is believed to be attributable to the use of anticoccidial drugs and vaccines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Prakashbabu <italic>et al.,</italic> 2017</xref>).</p>
				<p>A study regarding the prevalence of coccidiosis in Santa Catarina (B.R.) using PCR showed that 96% of the farms were positive for <italic>Eimeria</italic>, with seven species identified: <italic>E. maxima</italic> (63.7%) and <italic>E. acervulina</italic> (63.3%), <italic>E. tenella</italic> (54.6%), <italic>E. mitis</italic> (38.6%), <italic>E. praecox</italic> (25.1%), <italic>E. necatrix</italic> (24.3%) and E<italic>. brunetti</italic> (13.1%), with an average of 2.96 species per farm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Moraes <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>). Another study in a small region of the state of Tocantins reported the occurrence of coccidiosis in all farms, with the presence of <italic>E. maxima</italic>, <italic>E. acervulina</italic>, <italic>E. mitis</italic>, and <italic>E. tenella</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Toledo <italic>et al</italic>., 2011</xref>). The high preponderance of an <italic>Eimeria</italic> species may indicate its resistance to the drugs usually exposed, as is the case of <italic>E. tenella</italic> studied in Nigeria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ojimelukwe <italic>et al.</italic>, 2018</xref>) <italic>E. maxima micro</italic> and <italic>E. acervulina</italic> in the present study and the others reported in Brazil. The diagnosis is important and necessary to outline strategies, as according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Teeter <italic>et al.</italic> (2008)</xref>, it was observed that for each point of increase in the microscopic evaluation of coccidiosis lesions, daily weight gain decreased 1.5% of the body weight (g) during the six-day challenge period. Therefore, it is essential to know the degree of intestinal damage to quantify the birds' performance.</p>
				<p>The rapid intestinal replication cycle (4 to 6 days) and the oral/fecal route make coccidiosis a severe problem of intensive breeding, caused by recurrent infections and resistance to coccidiostats agents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Shivaramaiah <italic>et al.,</italic> 2014</xref>). Without effective control, the number of parasites can increase to the point of clinical coccidiosis. To avoid resistance, drug rotation, and vaccination programs are carried out (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Lan <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>). The rotation of coccidiostats agents can help clarify the significant oscillations of occurrence between <italic>Eimeria</italic> species, as verified in this study.</p>
				<p>Vaccination is the most interesting prophylactic measure; however, it is used only in broiler breeders (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdul Rasheed and Matsler, 2020</xref>) and laying hens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chapman <italic>et al</italic>., 2014</xref>). Commercial <italic>in ovo</italic> vaccination for coccidiosis in broilers has become widely accepted in the U.S. poultry industry; however, its effects on performance have yet to be studied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sokale <italic>et al.,</italic> 2020</xref>). It is essential to emphasize the importance of studies of species prevalence for the development of regional vaccines, as in this study. The use of antimicrobials has been analyzed with a view to replacing them in order to avoid the resistance problem, and several alternatives have been proposed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kim <italic>et al.,</italic> 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bortoluzzi et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Lu <italic>et al.,</italic> 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Park <italic>et al.,</italic> 2020</xref>). The low amount of oocysts present in the samples in this study (score 1) and the few observations of the zero score (no oocysts/sample) may indicate the effectiveness of chemical anticoccidials' strategic use via feed.</p>
				<p>In addition to the loss of performance, coccidiosis is a predisposing factor for an even more harmful pathology in birds, such as necrotic enteritis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Williams, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Adhikari et a</xref>). <italic>E. maxima</italic>'s presence was considered by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Paiva and McElroy (2014)</xref>) to be an essential risk factor for promoting <italic>Clostridium perfringens</italic>, and this must be considered in the search for effective control methods for farms in Brazil.</p>
				<p>For herd monitoring, the mucosa visualization and oocyst counting, and classification technique remains the most viable for the Brazilian agribusiness, to the detriment of the qPCR test, also available for diagnosis and quantification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Velkers <italic>et al.,</italic> 2010</xref>). This would considerably increase the monitoring and require differential care of the samples.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="conclusions">
				<title>CONCLUSIONS</title>
				<p>In conclusion, subclinical coccidiosis has a worrying prevalence, with every ten birds 3.5 having coccidiosis. This is one of the factors that likely causes reductions in the broiler batches' productive performance as well as being a predisposing factor for clostridiosis. Because attempts to eradicate the parasite by quarantine, disinfection, and sanitation have not been successful (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">McDougald, 2008</xref>), it is of fundamental importance that professionals in the poultry sector to carry out subclinical coccidiosis assessments routinely, thereby being able to intervene if necessary, to maintain the productive performance of broilers.</p>
			</sec>
		</body>
	</sub-article>
</article>